Latitude.sh vs phoenixNAP: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Latitude.sh and phoenixNAP to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Latitude.sh
6.9/10
Bare metal cloud provider that offers dedicated servers, GPU servers and virtual machines on demand, billed hourly or monthly, for developers and infrastructure-heavy businesses.
phoenixNAP
6.5/10
phoenixNAP is an infrastructure provider whose services include API-driven Bare Metal Cloud, dedicated servers, colocation, object storage, and backup for developers and IT teams.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.9/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro | $616/mo Bare Metal Cloud a2 |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro | $616/mo Bare Metal Cloud a2 |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| DDoS Protection | ||
| Dedicated Servers | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
Latitude.sh vs phoenixNAP cost by team size
Latitude.sh costs less at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Latitude.sh | phoenixNAP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $616/moBare Metal Cloud a2 |
| 5 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $616/moBare Metal Cloud a2 |
| 10 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $616/moBare Metal Cloud a2 |
| 25 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $616/moBare Metal Cloud a2 |
| 50 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $616/moBare Metal Cloud a2 |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Latitude.sh
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: $18/mo vs $616/mo
- Higher Analytics score (5/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose phoenixNAP
Our data shows no clear advantage over Latitude.sh.
Pros & Cons
Latitude.sh
Pros
- Prices for every metal, GPU and VM plan are listed publicly, with hourly rates as well as monthly ones.
- Each listed plan includes 20 TB of outbound bandwidth, and inbound traffic is unlimited.
- Servers are offered in 26 locations, including several in Latin America such as Sao Paulo, Bogota, Santiago, Buenos Aires and Mexico City.
- Servers can be automated through the API, SDKs, CLI and a Terraform provider.
- Current-generation AMD EPYC hardware runs alongside B300, RTX PRO 6000 and H100 GPU options.
Cons
- There is no managed WordPress, managed database or serverless offering, so you need operations expertise.
- Independent user reviews are scarce, and PeerSpot shows no reviews at all.
- Bandwidth overage rates and storage prices are not shown on the main pricing page.
- The Megaport acquisition may change the roadmap over time, although Latitude.sh says the brand and billing stay the same.
phoenixNAP
Pros
- Single-tenant bare metal servers can be provisioned by API, CLI, or Terraform and billed by the hour.
- Integrates natively with Terraform, Ansible, and Pulumi, and can deploy servers with SUSE Rancher pre-installed for Kubernetes.
- Hardware options range from small Xeon E3 machines to dual-socket servers with 1 TB of RAM and Ampere Arm servers.
- DDoS protection and 24/7 support by phone, ticket, and chat are included.
Cons
- Prices are higher than traditional budget dedicated hosts such as Hetzner or OVHcloud.
- Servers are unmanaged, so the customer handles patching and administration.
- There is no shared hosting or managed WordPress for simple websites.
- Few public user reviews are available; G2 shows only one.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Latitude.sh scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 6.9/10 against 6.5/10 for phoenixNAP. The largest gap is in Analytics: 5/10 for Latitude.sh and 4/10 for phoenixNAP.
Latitude.sh costs less for 10 users: about $18/mo on its Virtual Machine vm.micro plan, against about $616/mo on its Bare Metal Cloud a2 plan for phoenixNAP, billed monthly.
No, neither Latitude.sh nor phoenixNAP lists a free plan.
