Latitude.sh vs Modal: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Latitude.sh and Modal to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Latitude.sh
6.8/10
Bare metal cloud provider that offers dedicated servers, GPU servers and virtual machines on demand, billed hourly or monthly, for developers and infrastructure-heavy businesses.
Modal
6.7/10
Modal is a serverless cloud platform that runs Python code on GPUs and CPUs with per-second billing, aimed at teams building and serving AI applications.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.8/10 | 6.7/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro | $250/mo Team |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro | $250/mo Team |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | ||
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Managed WordPress | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | Not listed | |
Latitude.sh vs Modal cost by team size
Modal costs less at 1 user; Latitude.sh costs less from 5 users.
| Team size | Latitude.sh | Modal |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | FreeStarter |
| 5 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $250/moTeam |
| 10 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $250/moTeam |
| 25 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $250/moTeam |
| 50 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $250/moTeam |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Latitude.sh
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: $18/mo vs $250/mo
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 7/10)
- Includes Dedicated Servers, which Modal lacks
Why choose Modal
- Has a free plan (Latitude.sh does not)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Analytics score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for startups (9/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Latitude.sh
Pros
- Prices for every metal, GPU and VM plan are listed publicly, with hourly rates as well as monthly ones.
- Each listed plan includes 20 TB of outbound bandwidth, and inbound traffic is unlimited.
- Servers are offered in 26 locations, including several in Latin America such as Sao Paulo, Bogota, Santiago, Buenos Aires and Mexico City.
- Servers can be automated through the API, SDKs, CLI and a Terraform provider.
- Current-generation AMD EPYC hardware runs alongside B300, RTX PRO 6000 and H100 GPU options.
Cons
- There is no managed WordPress, managed database or serverless offering, so you need operations expertise.
- Independent user reviews are scarce, and PeerSpot shows no reviews at all.
- Bandwidth overage rates and storage prices are not shown on the main pricing page.
- The Megaport acquisition may change the roadmap over time, although Latitude.sh says the brand and billing stay the same.
Modal
Pros
- GPUs from the T4 up to the B300 are available without quota requests or reservations, and workloads can burst to thousands of containers.
- Per-second billing and scale-to-zero mean idle bursty inference workloads cost nothing.
- Python developers define infrastructure in code and deploy with a single CLI command, with no Kubernetes or Dockerfiles needed.
- The free Starter plan includes $30 a month of compute, and startup and academic credit programs are available.
- Sandboxes support large numbers of concurrent isolated environments for AI agents and untrusted code.
Cons
- Always-on or steady workloads can cost more than reserved GPU rentals from providers such as RunPod or Lambda.
- Containers stay billable for 60 seconds after the last request by default, and keep-warm settings are a common source of bill surprises.
- Region pinning raises prices by 1.15 to 1.75 times, and non-preemptible execution by 3 times.
- SSO, audit logs, and HIPAA support are limited to the custom-priced Enterprise plan.
- Credits from AWS, GCP, or Azure cannot be applied to Modal usage.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Latitude.sh scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 6.7/10 for Modal. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 6/10 for Latitude.sh and 8/10 for Modal.
Latitude.sh costs less for 10 users: about $18/mo on its Virtual Machine vm.micro plan, against about $250/mo on its Team plan for Modal, billed monthly.
Modal has a free plan; Latitude.sh does not list one.
Modal is the better fit for startups: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for Latitude.sh.
Latitude.sh has Dedicated Servers, which Modal lacks.
