Latitude.sh vs Linode (Akamai Cloud): Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Latitude.sh and Linode (Akamai Cloud) to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Latitude.sh
6.9/10
Bare metal cloud provider that offers dedicated servers, GPU servers and virtual machines on demand, billed hourly or monthly, for developers and infrastructure-heavy businesses.
Linode (Akamai Cloud)
7/10
Developer-focused cloud platform, now run by Akamai, offering VPS compute, managed Kubernetes, managed databases and object storage at flat, predictable prices.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.9/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro | $5/mo Nanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro | $5/mo Nanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| DDoS Protection | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| VPS Hosting | ||
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
Latitude.sh vs Linode (Akamai Cloud) cost by team size
Linode (Akamai Cloud) costs less at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Latitude.sh | Linode (Akamai Cloud) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $5/moNanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
| 5 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $5/moNanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
| 10 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $5/moNanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
| 25 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $5/moNanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
| 50 users | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro | $5/moNanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Latitude.sh
- Higher Scalability score (8/10 vs 7/10)
- Higher Support score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (7/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose Linode (Akamai Cloud)
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: $5/mo vs $18/mo
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for small business (5/10 vs 3/10)
Pros & Cons
Latitude.sh
Pros
- Prices for every metal, GPU and VM plan are listed publicly, with hourly rates as well as monthly ones.
- Each listed plan includes 20 TB of outbound bandwidth, and inbound traffic is unlimited.
- Servers are offered in 26 locations, including several in Latin America such as Sao Paulo, Bogota, Santiago, Buenos Aires and Mexico City.
- Servers can be automated through the API, SDKs, CLI and a Terraform provider.
- Current-generation AMD EPYC hardware runs alongside B300, RTX PRO 6000 and H100 GPU options.
Cons
- There is no managed WordPress, managed database or serverless offering, so you need operations expertise.
- Independent user reviews are scarce, and PeerSpot shows no reviews at all.
- Bandwidth overage rates and storage prices are not shown on the main pricing page.
- The Megaport acquisition may change the roadmap over time, although Latitude.sh says the brand and billing stay the same.
Linode (Akamai Cloud)
Pros
- Flat published prices, starting at 5 dollars a month for a 1 GB Nanode, with hourly billing
- The standard Kubernetes control plane in LKE is free
- Egress overage costs only 0.005 dollars per GB, and most shared plans include 1 to 5 TB of transfer
- Its documentation, API, CLI and Terraform support are strong, which suits developers who automate their infrastructure
- DDoS protection is included, and inbound bandwidth is 40 Gbps on all plans
Cons
- Some 2025 reviews report new accounts flagged as fraud or suspended, with tickets taking 24 to 48 hours
- No live chat support is offered, and standard support has no published response-time SLA
- Reviewers say managed services and advanced enterprise features are fewer than on the hyperscalers
- Managed databases cost more than on budget providers, with HA starting around 246 dollars a month according to one third-party guide
- The Akamai rebrand has confused some customers and, by their account, hurt trust
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Linode (Akamai Cloud) scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7/10 against 6.9/10 for Latitude.sh. The largest gap is in Cost: 6/10 for Latitude.sh and 8/10 for Linode (Akamai Cloud).
Linode (Akamai Cloud) costs less for 10 users: about $5/mo on its Nanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) plan, against about $18/mo on its Virtual Machine vm.micro plan for Latitude.sh, billed monthly.
No, neither Latitude.sh nor Linode (Akamai Cloud) lists a free plan.
Latitude.sh is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 7/10 for them, against 5/10 for Linode (Akamai Cloud).
