HaloPSA vs NocoDB: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of HaloPSA and NocoDB to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
HaloPSA
7.1/10
HaloPSA is a professional services automation platform for managed service providers and IT service teams. It combines ticketing, projects, time tracking, billing and reporting.
NocoDB
6.7/10
NocoDB is a source-available, Airtable-style no-code database that puts spreadsheet views and APIs on top of SQL databases, available as cloud or self-hosted software.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.1/10 | 6.7/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 4/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 9/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 4/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | £66/user/mo Halo (single plan) | $15/user/mo Plus |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Free Community (Self-hosted) |
| Features | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Dashboards | ||
| Scheduling | ||
| Workflow automation | ||
| Client collaboration | Not listed | |
| Collaboration tools | Not listed | |
| Databases | Not listed | |
| File sharing | Not listed | |
| Kanban boards | Not listed | |
| Knowledge base | Not listed | |
| Reporting | Not listed | |
| Spreadsheet interface | Not listed | |
| Task management | Not listed | |
| Time tracking | Not listed | |
HaloPSA vs NocoDB cost by team size
| Team size | HaloPSA | NocoDB |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | FreeFree (Cloud) |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | FreeCommunity (Self-hosted) |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | FreeCommunity (Self-hosted) |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | FreeCommunity (Self-hosted) |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | FreeCommunity (Self-hosted) |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose HaloPSA
- Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Support score (7/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for mid-market (8/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose NocoDB
- Has a free plan (HaloPSA does not)
- Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for freelancers (5/10 vs 2/10)
Pros & Cons
HaloPSA
Pros
- One per-agent plan includes every module and the AI features, with no paid add-ons.
- Portal customers and end users are free, so client collaboration does not add licence cost.
- More than 250 integrations, including accounting and RMM tools, are included at no extra charge.
- Broad compliance coverage includes ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP and HIPAA, plus SSO and audit logs.
- Reviewers describe the browser interface as modern and fast.
Cons
- Reviewers say the configuration menus are convoluted, and a consultant is often needed to get the most out of it.
- A paid onboarding package is mandatory and its price is not published.
- The project features are oriented toward IT service delivery rather than complex professional services projects.
- Some users report slowness and weaker calendar, notification and stock-control features.
- Per-agent costs add up for larger teams.
NocoDB
Pros
- The self-hosted Community edition is free, with no limits on records, storage or seats.
- It connects to existing PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server or SQLite databases without migrating data.
- Every table gets an automatic REST API.
- On Plus and Business you pay for at most 9 seats, and any further users are free, which is cheaper for larger teams.
- Higher tiers add row-level security, audit logs and SAML SSO.
Cons
- Reviewers find the interface less polished than Airtable's.
- The formula language is less deep than Airtable's.
- The cloud free tier is capped at 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage.
- Self-hosting needs Docker and server skills.
- The Sustainable Use License restricts reselling NocoDB as a managed service.
- It lacks dedicated project management features such as time tracking.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
HaloPSA scores higher on our Project Management criteria: 7.1/10 against 6.7/10 for NocoDB. The largest gap is in Cost: 5/10 for HaloPSA and 9/10 for NocoDB.
NocoDB has a free plan; HaloPSA does not list one.
NocoDB is the better fit for startups: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 4/10 for HaloPSA.
