b stack radar

Guru vs Langdock: Complete Comparison (2026)

An in-depth comparison of Guru and Langdock to help you choose the right tool for your business.

Last updated: November 2026

Guru logo

Guru

6.6/10

Guru is an AI knowledge platform that gives company teams verified answers from internal content inside Slack, Teams, the browser, and AI tools.

Langdock logo

Langdock

7.1/10

Winner

Langdock is a Berlin-based, EU-hosted AI workspace where company teams chat with many AI models, build custom agents, and automate workflows under central governance.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Guru logo
Guru
Langdock logo
Langdock
Scores
Overall Rating6.6/107.1/10
Integration8/107/10
Analytics6/106/10
Customization6/108/10
Ease of Use7/107/10
Support8/107/10
Cost4/105/10
Scalability7/108/10
Security8/109/10
Output Quality7/108/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricing€23/user/mo
Core
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricing€232/mo
Core
Features
AI Agents
API Access
Chatbots
Enterprise Controls
Knowledge Base Search
Text Generation
Private DeploymentNot listed
TranscriptionNot listed
Workflow AutomationNot listed

Guru vs Langdock cost by team size

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

Guru logo
Why choose Guru

  • Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 7/10)
  • Higher Support score (8/10 vs 7/10)
  • Better fit for operations teams (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for remote teams (6/10 vs 4/10)

Langdock logo
Why choose Langdock

  • Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Cost score (5/10 vs 4/10)
  • Better fit for freelancers (3/10 vs 1/10)

Pros & Cons

Guru logo
Guru

Pros

  • The verification workflow asks experts to re-approve content on a schedule, so readers can tell whether an answer is still trusted.
  • Answers are available inside Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a browser extension, so users do not have to switch tools.
  • An MCP server and a public REST API let ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, and custom apps use the same knowledge.
  • Strong security credentials: SOC 2 Type II, SAML SSO, SCIM, and IP allowlisting.
  • Reviews are consistently high, with a 4.7 of 5 rating on G2 from over 2,300 reviews.

Cons

  • No public pricing, self-serve signup, or published free trial.
  • Search can be slow or inaccurate in large content libraries, and results depend on how well content is tagged.
  • Content becomes cluttered over time without a dedicated person to own verification and tagging.
  • The card editor has limited formatting options.

Langdock logo
Langdock

Pros

  • Access to 40+ models from several providers in one interface, so teams can switch models without buying separate ChatGPT and Claude licences.
  • Strong EU compliance posture: ISO 27001 certification, a SOC 2 Type II audit, GDPR compliance and EU hosting on Azure.
  • SSO, SCIM and SAML are included even on the entry Core plan.
  • Non-technical staff can build no-code agents with their own knowledge bases and permissions.
  • Deployment options range from multi-tenant SaaS to single-tenant, bring-your-own-cloud and on-premise Kubernetes.

Cons

  • There is no permanent free tier, only a 7-day trial.
  • Dedicated and on-premise deployments require 2,000 to 5,000+ seats.
  • Reviewers say its workflows still leave many actions to humans, so automation of operational tasks is limited.
  • Building advanced agents has a learning curve.
  • Per-seat pricing with Max seat upgrades and workflow add-ons can get expensive for small teams.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Langdock scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7.1/10 against 6.6/10 for Guru. The largest gap is in Customization: 6/10 for Guru and 8/10 for Langdock.

No, neither Guru nor Langdock lists a free plan.

Langdock is the better fit for freelancers: we rate it 3/10 for them, against 1/10 for Guru.

Related Comparisons