b stack radar

GitHub vs GitLab Comparison

Compare GitHub vs GitLab features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

GitHub logo

GitHub

6.9/10

Winner

GitHub is a code hosting and collaboration platform that also offers issue tracking and GitHub Projects boards, tables and roadmaps for software teams.

GitLab logo

GitLab

6.8/10

GitLab is a DevSecOps platform that combines source code, CI/CD, security, and agile planning with issues, boards, and epics for software teams.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
GitHub logo
GitHub
GitLab logo
GitLab
Scores
Overall Rating6.9/106.8/10
Analytics3/107/10
Cost9/104/10
Customization6/108/10
Ease of Use5/105/10
Integration9/108/10
Scalability8/109/10
Security8/109/10
Support6/106/10
Pricing
Free planYesYes
Cheapest paid plan$4/user/mo
Team
$29/user/mo
Premium
Estimated cost for 10 usersFree
Free
Contact for pricing
Features
Docs
Spreadsheet interfaceNot listed
File sharing
App integrations
Task lists
Timeline view
Task management
Time tracking
Workflow automation
Kanban boards
Collaboration tools
Reporting
Knowledge base

GitHub vs GitLab cost by team size

GitHub and GitLab cost the same up to 5 users.

Team sizeGitHubGitLab
1 userFreeFreeFreeFree
5 usersFreeFreeFreeFree
10 usersFreeFreeContact for pricing
25 usersFreeFreeContact for pricing
50 usersFreeFreeContact for pricing

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

GitHub logo
Why choose GitHub

  • Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 4/10)
  • Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 8/10)
  • Better fit for small business (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for startups (9/10 vs 7/10)

GitLab logo
Why choose GitLab

  • Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 3/10)
  • Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for enterprise (9/10 vs 7/10)
  • Includes Time tracking, which GitHub lacks

Pros & Cons

GitHub logo
GitHub

Pros

  • Projects sits next to issues, pull requests and commits, and items can move to Done automatically when linked pull requests merge.
  • Projects is included in every plan, and paid plans start at 4 USD per user per month.
  • Table, board and roadmap layouts, with custom and iteration fields, cover basic sprint planning.
  • One project can pull issues from multiple repositories.
  • The GraphQL API, GitHub Actions and the Marketplace make it highly extensible.

Cons

  • There are no built-in burndown, velocity, cumulative flow or cycle-time reports.
  • Boards have no WIP limits, and there is no workload or capacity planning.
  • Reviewers say it has a steep learning curve and is unfriendly for non-technical stakeholders.
  • Projects is limited to 50 fields, and the roadmap view does not handle dependencies or critical paths.

GitLab logo
GitLab

Pros

  • Planning, code, CI/CD, and security live in one tool, so issues link directly to merge requests and pipelines.
  • Time tracking with estimates and logged time is included on every tier, including Free.
  • It can be self-managed or run as single-tenant Dedicated, which suits regulated enterprises.
  • Reviewers on G2 and Capterra rate it about 4.5 out of 5 and praise its robust CI/CD and version control.

Cons

  • Users who don't write code face a lot of complexity, and reviewers complain about frequent interface changes.
  • Ultimate pricing isn't public, and Premium is listed only with annual billing.
  • OKRs require Ultimate and are still not ready for production; the global time tracking report is also experimental.
  • Users have long complained that epics exist only at the group level.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

GitHub scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.9/10 against 6.8/10 for GitLab. The largest gap is in Cost: 9/10 for GitHub and 4/10 for GitLab.

Yes, both GitHub and GitLab have a free plan.

GitLab is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for GitHub.

GitLab has Time tracking, which GitHub lacks.

Related Comparisons