b stack radar

Ghost vs Skool: Complete Comparison (2026)

An in-depth comparison of Ghost and Skool to help you choose the right tool for your business.

Last updated: November 2026

Ghost logo

Ghost

6.9/10

Winner

Open-source publishing platform that combines a website, newsletters, and paid memberships for independent publishers, creators, and media businesses.

Skool logo

Skool

5/10

Skool is an all-in-one community platform that lets creators, coaches and small businesses run paid online communities with courses, live calls and gamification.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Ghost logo
Ghost
Skool logo
Skool
Scores
Overall Rating6.9/105/10
Analytics6/104/10
Cost7/107/10
Customization8/102/10
Ease of Use7/109/10
Integration7/103/10
Scalability7/106/10
Security7/104/10
Support5/104/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricing$9/mo
Hobby
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricing$9/mo
Hobby
Features
Landing Pages
A/B Testing
Email MarketingNot listed
SegmentationNot listed
SMS MarketingNot listed
WebinarsNot listed

Ghost vs Skool cost by team size

Team sizeGhostSkool
1 userContact for pricing$9/moHobby
5 usersContact for pricing$9/moHobby
10 usersContact for pricing$9/moHobby
25 usersContact for pricing$9/moHobby
50 usersContact for pricing$9/moHobby

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

Ghost logo
Why choose Ghost

  • Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 2/10)
  • Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 3/10)
  • Better fit for enterprise (5/10 vs 2/10)
  • Better fit for marketing teams (5/10 vs 2/10)
  • Includes Landing Pages, which Skool lacks

Skool logo
Why choose Skool

  • Higher Ease of Use score (9/10 vs 7/10)

Pros & Cons

Ghost logo
Ghost

Pros

  • Ghost takes no percentage of membership revenue, unlike Substack's 10% fee, so publishers pay only the plan price and Stripe fees.
  • Website, newsletter, and paid memberships work together without plugins.
  • The open-source core can be self-hosted for free, and APIs and webhooks support custom builds.
  • More than 100 listed integrations, including Zapier, Stripe, Mailchimp, and privacy-focused analytics tools.

Cons

  • Email features are basic: segmentation is limited and there is no built-in A/B testing or SMS.
  • Email delivery depends on Mailgun, which users say can be costly or unreliable when self-hosting.
  • Lower plans get email-only support with no weekend coverage, and Trustpilot reviews complain about billing and refunds.
  • The Starter plan excludes paid subscriptions, custom themes, and integrations.

Skool logo
Skool

Pros

  • Feed, courses, calendar and leaderboard sit in one simple interface, so members need little onboarding.
  • The points and levels system can gate content and encourages members to return.
  • Both plans include unlimited members, courses and videos at a flat monthly price.
  • Skool acts as merchant of record, handling sales tax and paying out weekly.
  • A discovery page can bring in new members without paid advertising.

Cons

  • The Hobby plan's 10% fee becomes expensive once monthly revenue passes about 1,300 USD.
  • There is no native email marketing, landing page or funnel builder.
  • Branding is limited to a custom URL, and fonts, colours and layout cannot be changed.
  • Zapier, webinars, affiliates and the custom URL are Pro-only.
  • You cannot use your own Stripe account, and Trustpilot reviews complain about cancellations and unanswered support requests.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Ghost scores higher on our Marketing criteria: 6.9/10 against 5/10 for Skool. The largest gap is in Customization: 8/10 for Ghost and 2/10 for Skool.

No, neither Ghost nor Skool lists a free plan.

Ghost is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 5/10 for them, against 2/10 for Skool.

Ghost has Landing Pages, which Skool lacks.

Related Comparisons