b stack radar

Ghost vs MailerSend: Complete Comparison (2026)

An in-depth comparison of Ghost and MailerSend to help you choose the right tool for your business.

Last updated: November 2026

Ghost logo

Ghost

6.9/10

Open-source publishing platform that combines a website, newsletters, and paid memberships for independent publishers, creators, and media businesses.

MailerSend logo

MailerSend

6.9/10

MailerSend is a transactional email and SMS API with SMTP relay and a template builder, aimed at developers and businesses sending app-triggered messages.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Ghost logo
Ghost
MailerSend logo
MailerSend
Scores
Overall Rating6.9/106.9/10
Scalability7/107/10
Ease of Use7/108/10
Customization8/106/10
Security7/106/10
Support5/108/10
Cost7/107/10
Integration7/107/10
Analytics6/106/10
Pricing
Free planNoYes
Cheapest paid planContact for pricing$7/mo
Hobby
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricing$110/mo
Professional
Features
Email Marketing
A/B TestingNot listed
Landing PagesNot listed
SegmentationNot listed

Ghost vs MailerSend cost by team size

Team sizeGhostMailerSend
1 userContact for pricingFreeFree
5 usersContact for pricing$7/moHobby
10 usersContact for pricing$110/moProfessional
25 usersContact for pricing$110/moProfessional
50 usersContact for pricing$110/moProfessional

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Which One Should You Choose?

Ghost logo
Why choose Ghost

  • Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Security score (7/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for freelancers (8/10 vs 6/10)

MailerSend logo
Why choose MailerSend

  • Has a free plan (Ghost does not)
  • Higher Support score (8/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 7/10)
  • Better fit for agencies (7/10 vs 4/10)
  • Better fit for startups (9/10 vs 6/10)

Pros & Cons

Ghost logo
Ghost

Pros

  • Ghost takes no percentage of membership revenue, unlike Substack's 10% fee, so publishers pay only the plan price and Stripe fees.
  • Website, newsletter, and paid memberships work together without plugins.
  • The open-source core can be self-hosted for free, and APIs and webhooks support custom builds.
  • More than 100 listed integrations, including Zapier, Stripe, Mailchimp, and privacy-focused analytics tools.

Cons

  • Email features are basic: segmentation is limited and there is no built-in A/B testing or SMS.
  • Email delivery depends on Mailgun, which users say can be costly or unreliable when self-hosting.
  • Lower plans get email-only support with no weekend coverage, and Trustpilot reviews complain about billing and refunds.
  • The Starter plan excludes paid subscriptions, custom themes, and integrations.

MailerSend logo
MailerSend

Pros

  • Developers can send through a REST API or an SMTP relay, with SDKs and connectors for Laravel, Django, Rails, Symfony, Supabase and Firebase.
  • A free tier of 500 emails and a $7 Hobby plan make it cheap to start.
  • Capterra reviewers repeatedly praise its responsive support and clear documentation.
  • Built-in blocklist and DMARC monitoring help teams protect deliverability.
  • Starter and higher plans add an SMS API, and a WhatsApp add-on is available.

Cons

  • It is built for transactional email, not full marketing campaign management.
  • Reviewers report sudden throttling or account suspensions after bounce or complaint thresholds are crossed.
  • Free and Hobby plans keep only one day of activity history.
  • SMS is limited to the USA and Canada.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Ghost and MailerSend both score 6.9/10 on our Marketing criteria. The largest gap is in Support: 5/10 for Ghost and 8/10 for MailerSend.

MailerSend has a free plan; Ghost does not list one.

MailerSend is the better fit for agencies: we rate it 7/10 for them, against 4/10 for Ghost.

Related Comparisons