Gcore vs Servers.com: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Gcore and Servers.com to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Gcore
6.9/10
Luxembourg-based edge and cloud provider offering CDN, virtual machines, bare metal, managed Kubernetes, object storage, AI GPU cloud, and DDoS/WAF security for businesses.
Servers.com
6.4/10
Servers.com rents dedicated bare metal, hourly scalable bare metal, GPU servers, cloud servers, managed Kubernetes and storage to technical teams in 12 cities.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.9/10 | 6.4/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | €390/mo DDoS Protection Start | $5/mo Cloud Server SSD.30 |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | €390/mo DDoS Protection Start | $5/mo Cloud Server SSD.30 |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Dedicated Servers | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Object Storage | ||
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed WordPress | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
Gcore vs Servers.com cost by team size
| Team size | Gcore | Servers.com |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | €390/moDDoS Protection Start | $5/moCloud Server SSD.30 |
| 5 users | €390/moDDoS Protection Start | $5/moCloud Server SSD.30 |
| 10 users | €390/moDDoS Protection Start | $5/moCloud Server SSD.30 |
| 25 users | €390/moDDoS Protection Start | $5/moCloud Server SSD.30 |
| 50 users | €390/moDDoS Protection Start | $5/moCloud Server SSD.30 |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Gcore
- Has a free plan (Servers.com does not)
- Higher Security score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose Servers.com
- Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Gcore
Pros
- The CDN includes 1 TB of traffic and 1 billion requests free each month, and traffic after that starts at 0.01 EUR per GB.
- DDoS protection pricing does not depend on attack size, and mitigation is not metered on any plan.
- The managed Kubernetes control plane is free with high availability, so you pay only for the nodes.
- A large edge footprint, reported at about 210 PoPs and 200 Tbps of capacity, suits latency-sensitive workloads such as gaming and streaming.
- Headquarters in Luxembourg is an advantage for buyers who prefer an EU-based provider.
Cons
- Trustpilot scores are around 2.5 out of 5, with complaints about recurring billing, refunds, and slow support.
- There is no public price list for VMs and bare metal; prices are only available through the calculator.
- The Terraform v2 provider is still in alpha and Gcore says it is not ready for production.
- The product range is very broad, which can make it harder for small teams to understand how pricing works.
Servers.com
Pros
- Developers can automate servers with an official REST API, the srvctl CLI and a Terraform provider.
- Scalable Bare Metal rents physical servers by the hour, so teams can add capacity for demand spikes.
- Data centers in 12 cities across North America, Europe, South America and Asia Pacific.
- One provider covers bare metal, GPU servers, cloud, Kubernetes and private racks, which helps teams that want a hybrid setup.
Cons
- There is no public price list, so buyers must rely on third-party listings or a quote to see costs.
- Reviewers describe the product documentation as lackluster.
- Public user reviews report abrupt account terminations over alleged abuse, and slow or templated support replies.
- It uses a custom control panel with no cPanel and no shared or WordPress hosting, so it is a poor fit for non-technical buyers.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Gcore scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 6.9/10 against 6.4/10 for Servers.com. The largest gap is in Analytics: 7/10 for Gcore and 5/10 for Servers.com.
Gcore has a free plan; Servers.com does not list one.
