Gcore vs Kyndryl: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Gcore and Kyndryl to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Gcore
6.9/10
Luxembourg-based edge and cloud provider offering CDN, virtual machines, bare metal, managed Kubernetes, object storage, AI GPU cloud, and DDoS/WAF security for businesses.
Kyndryl
6.4/10
Kyndryl is an IT infrastructure services company that designs, runs, and modernizes hybrid cloud, mainframe, network, and security environments for large enterprises.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.9/10 | 6.4/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 7/10 | 2/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 3/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | €390/mo DDoS Protection Start | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | €390/mo DDoS Protection Start | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | Not listed | |
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| Multiple Regions | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
Gcore vs Kyndryl cost by team size
| Team size | Gcore | Kyndryl |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | €390/moDDoS Protection Start | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | €390/moDDoS Protection Start | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | €390/moDDoS Protection Start | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | €390/moDDoS Protection Start | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | €390/moDDoS Protection Start | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Gcore
- Has a free plan (Kyndryl does not)
- Higher Cost score (7/10 vs 2/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 3/10)
- Better fit for startups (6/10 vs 1/10)
Why choose Kyndryl
- Higher Support score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Gcore
Pros
- The CDN includes 1 TB of traffic and 1 billion requests free each month, and traffic after that starts at 0.01 EUR per GB.
- DDoS protection pricing does not depend on attack size, and mitigation is not metered on any plan.
- The managed Kubernetes control plane is free with high availability, so you pay only for the nodes.
- A large edge footprint, reported at about 210 PoPs and 200 Tbps of capacity, suits latency-sensitive workloads such as gaming and streaming.
- Headquarters in Luxembourg is an advantage for buyers who prefer an EU-based provider.
Cons
- Trustpilot scores are around 2.5 out of 5, with complaints about recurring billing, refunds, and slow support.
- There is no public price list for VMs and bare metal; prices are only available through the calculator.
- The Terraform v2 provider is still in alpha and Gcore says it is not ready for production.
- The product range is very broad, which can make it harder for small teams to understand how pricing works.
Kyndryl
Pros
- It has deep mainframe and IBM Z or IBM i outsourcing experience, which Gartner Peer Insights reviewers single out.
- Reviewers praise its 24x7 network operations coverage and structured incident and change management.
- Its managed backup service is run and monitored by Kyndryl staff and covers on-site, off-site, and hybrid cloud setups across most servers, hypervisors, and databases.
- Its broad alliance list covers AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle, SAP, and VMware, which supports hybrid estates.
- Kyndryl Bridge adds AIOps-based alerting and automation across managed environments.
Cons
- There is no public pricing, and reviewers flag cost pressure on large engagements.
- Reviewers say onboarding and transitions often take longer than expected.
- Critics cite delayed CMDB delivery, limited reporting against the committed scope, and missing integrations with existing tools.
- SLAs and uptime commitments are negotiated per contract, and no standard public figures exist.
- It offers no self-service or on-demand hosting for smaller buyers.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Gcore scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 6.9/10 against 6.4/10 for Kyndryl. The largest gap is in Cost: 7/10 for Gcore and 2/10 for Kyndryl.
Gcore has a free plan; Kyndryl does not list one.
Gcore is the better fit for startups: we rate it 6/10 for them, against 1/10 for Kyndryl.
