b stack radar

FlytNow vs Sharper Shape (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict

FlytNow is our pick, scoring 6.6/10 against 5.5/10 for Sharper Shape on our AI Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Integration score (8/10 vs 6/10). Neither FlytNow nor Sharper Shape lists a free plan.

Last updated: November 2026

FlytNow logo

FlytNow

6.6/10

Winner

FlytNow, now sold as the FlytBase platform, is cloud and on-premise software for automating drone and drone-dock fleets used in enterprise inspection, security and infrastructure monitoring.

Sharper Shape logo

Sharper Shape

5.5/10

AI-powered asset and vegetation management software, Sharper CORE, for electric transmission and distribution utilities and the drone service providers that inspect their lines.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
FlytNow logo
FlytNow
Sharper Shape logo
Sharper Shape
Scores
Overall Rating6.6/105.5/10
Integration8/106/10
Analytics6/108/10
Customization7/105/10
Ease of Use6/105/10
Support5/106/10
Cost4/103/10
Scalability9/107/10
Security9/107/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricingContact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricingContact for pricing
Features
GIS and MappingNot listed
Power Line Inspection
Drone Inspection
SCADA and IoT IntegrationNot listed
Inspection Automation
LiDAR Processing
Predictive MaintenanceNot listed
Offline Field AppNot listed
Digital TwinNot listed
Asset RegistryNot listed

Who FlytNow and Sharper Shape suit

FlytNow fits enterprise better; Sharper Shape fits utilities better.

AudienceFlytNowSharper Shape
Enterprise9/10Built for multi-site docked fleets, with sovereign and on-premise deployment, ISO 27001 and SOC 2.7/10The vendor says it serves tier 1 utilities that manage large networks.
Utilities8/10The vendor has dedicated pages on substation, powerline and vegetation monitoring with AI anomaly detection.10/10The product is built for electric transmission and distribution line owners.
Energy Companies8/10Oil and gas, solar and mining are core target industries, with thermal and gas-leak detection agents.9/10It focuses on powerline asset and vegetation management for electricity networks.
Drone Service Providers8/10Marketed to drone service providers for turning off-the-shelf drones and docks into drone-in-a-box systems.8/10A dedicated version of CORE lets drone service providers deliver inspection data to utility clients.
Government7/10Public safety and drone-as-first-responder programs are a major use case, backed by air-gapped deployment options.Not rated
Small Business3/10Independent reviewers say it needs enterprise infrastructure and is not designed for small teams.Not rated

Which One Should You Choose?

FlytNow logo
Why choose FlytNow

  • Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Customization score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for enterprise (9/10 vs 7/10)

Sharper Shape logo
Why choose Sharper Shape

  • Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Support score (6/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for utilities (10/10 vs 8/10)
  • Includes LiDAR Processing, which FlytNow lacks

Pros & Cons

FlytNow logo
FlytNow

Pros

  • Hardware-agnostic: runs DJI Dock 2, 3 and 4 alongside Hextronics, Nokia and other docks, so organisations are not locked into one drone vendor as with DJI FlightHub 2
  • Broad deployment choice, including on-premise air-gapped, private cloud, AWS or Azure, and fully sovereign hosting, backed by stated ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certification
  • Flinks connectors link drone operations to Esri, DroneDeploy, Pix4D, Milestone, Genetec, Avigilon and other video, GIS and processing tools
  • One-to-many control with a video wall and automatic deconfliction, so a single pilot can supervise several docked drones for BVLOS programs
  • AI agents flag thermal hotspots, intrusions, gas leaks and equipment defects in live drone video

Cons

  • No public pricing: buyers must complete an assessment and wait for a quote
  • Not a mapping or photogrammetry tool, so survey and 3D outputs need a separate platform such as Pix4D or DroneDeploy
  • Very few independent user reviews. G2 shows only two, and one mentions slow support responses
  • Reviewers say it needs enterprise infrastructure and is not aimed at hobbyists or small teams
  • The FlytNow brand has been retired in favour of the FlytBase platform name, which can confuse buyers looking at older listings

Sharper Shape logo
Sharper Shape

Pros

  • Combines LiDAR, RGB, and infrared imagery from a single flight for both asset inspection and vegetation analysis.
  • Automated defect detection covers more than 40 transmission and distribution component types.
  • Field crews can update the digital twin from handheld devices, including while offline.
  • Holds ISO 27001 certification, and published profiles name large utilities such as SDG&E and PG&E as customers.
  • Sells both software and data collection services, so a utility can buy both from one vendor.

Cons

  • No public pricing; every deal is quote-based.
  • Narrow focus on powerlines and linear infrastructure, so it does not cover general plant maintenance or work orders.
  • Almost no independent user reviews on G2, Capterra, or similar sites.
  • The accuracy figures come from the vendor and have not been independently verified.

Not sold on either?

Air Inspection Automation (AiA) logo

Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product

Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.

Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools

Frequently Asked Questions

FlytNow scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.6/10 against 5.5/10 for Sharper Shape. The largest gap is in Analytics: 6/10 for FlytNow and 8/10 for Sharper Shape.

No, neither FlytNow nor Sharper Shape lists a free plan.

FlytNow is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for Sharper Shape.

Sharper Shape has LiDAR Processing, which FlytNow lacks.

Related Comparisons