FigJam vs Planview AdaptiveWork: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of FigJam and Planview AdaptiveWork to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
FigJam
6.8/10
FigJam is Figma's online whiteboard for team brainstorming, diagramming, workshops and lightweight project planning, sold through Figma seats.
Planview AdaptiveWork
6.6/10
Enterprise project and portfolio management platform, formerly Clarizen, for PMOs and professional services teams that need resource, financial and portfolio control.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.8/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Analytics | 2/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Ease of Use | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 3/10 |
| Scalability | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $3/user/mo Professional (Collab seat) | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Starter | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Client collaboration | ||
| App integrations | ||
| Timeline view | ||
| Workflow automation | ||
| Collaboration tools | ||
| Whiteboards | Not listed | |
| File sharing | Not listed | |
| Task lists | Not listed | |
| Gantt charts | Not listed | |
| Task management | Not listed | |
| Time tracking | Not listed | |
| Dashboards | Not listed | |
| Kanban boards | Not listed | |
| Reporting | Not listed | |
| Goals and OKRs | Not listed | |
FigJam vs Planview AdaptiveWork cost by team size
| Team size | FigJam | Planview AdaptiveWork |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeStarter | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | FreeStarter | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | FreeStarter | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | FreeStarter | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | FreeStarter | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose FigJam
- Has a free plan (Planview AdaptiveWork does not)
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 3/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 2/10)
- Better fit for small business (6/10 vs 3/10)
Why choose Planview AdaptiveWork
- Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 2/10)
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (9/10 vs 7/10)
- Includes Workflow automation, which FigJam lacks
Pros & Cons
FigJam
Pros
- Most teams pick it up quickly, and reviewers on Capterra and G2 (4.6/5) praise how easy it is to learn
- More than 300 templates for retros, standups, kickoffs and Gantt-style plans cut setup time
- External guests can join free for 24 hours without logging in
- The Collab seat costs only $3 to $5 per user per month
- AI can generate diagrams and templates, cluster stickies and summarize sessions into action items
Cons
- It is not a full project management tool: it has no dashboards, reporting, time tracking or workflow automation
- Reviewers report limited export options
- Performance can slow down on large boards
- It has no offline mode
- Seats are tied to Figma licensing, so the overall pricing structure is complex
Planview AdaptiveWork
Pros
- Deep customization, including custom objects and fields, dependent picklists and custom workflow actions.
- Reviewers single out reporting as a strength, and Slide Publisher automates PowerPoint status decks.
- Professional services financials, including rate cards, billable time, utilization and revenue forecasting, are built in.
- An External Collaborator portal gives clients access to projects, files and requests.
- It has a broad set of enterprise connectors, including Jira, Salesforce, ServiceNow, SAP and Microsoft Teams.
Cons
- No public pricing, and reviewers frequently call it expensive compared with similar tools.
- There is a steep learning curve, and some users find it overwhelming at first.
- Heavy customization can slow performance, especially over a VPN.
- Reviewers report mixed support, with slower resolution of complex issues.
- There is no separate development environment for testing workflows against live data.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
FigJam scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 6.6/10 for Planview AdaptiveWork. The largest gap is in Analytics: 2/10 for FigJam and 8/10 for Planview AdaptiveWork.
FigJam has a free plan; Planview AdaptiveWork does not list one.
FigJam is the better fit for startups: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 2/10 for Planview AdaptiveWork.
Planview AdaptiveWork has Workflow automation, which FigJam lacks.
