Fabrico vs Tulip (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Tulip is our pick, scoring 7.3/10 against 6.5/10 for Fabrico on our AI Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Customization score (9/10 vs 6/10). Neither Fabrico nor Tulip lists a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
Fabrico
6.5/10
Fabrico is a cloud platform for manufacturing plants that combines CMMS maintenance management, OEE and light MES monitoring, and AI add-ons for production losses.
Tulip
7.3/10
Tulip is a no-code, app-based manufacturing execution and connected worker platform that lets manufacturers build shop-floor apps for work instructions, quality checks, and machine monitoring.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.5/10 | 7.3/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 9/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | $100/user/mo Essentials |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | $1,000/mo Essentials |
| Features | ||
| Work Orders | Not listed | |
| Spare Parts Inventory | Not listed | |
| SCADA and IoT Integration | ||
| Inspection Automation | ||
| Preventive Maintenance | Not listed | |
| Condition Monitoring | ||
| Asset Registry | Not listed | |
| Inspection Checklists | Not listed | |
Fabrico vs Tulip cost by team size
| Team size | Fabrico | Tulip |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | $1,000/moEssentials |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | $2,500/moEssentials |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | $5,000/moEssentials |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who Fabrico and Tulip suit
| Audience | Fabrico | Tulip |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | 6/10It offers multi-site group reporting and names large customers such as ABB and Schaeffler, but the vendor is still small. | 7/10The Enterprise and Regulated Industries plans add workspaces, approval workflows, GxP features, and GovCloud options. |
| Manufacturing | 9/10Fabrico is built for production plants and combines OEE, downtime tracking and plant maintenance. | 10/10Tulip is built as an MES and connected worker platform for shop floors. |
| Operations Teams | 8/10OEE, downtime causes and the money value of each loss are aimed at plant operations leaders. | 8/10Operations engineers build and run frontline process apps without writing code. |
| Maintenance Teams | 8/10Its core CMMS covers work orders, preventive maintenance, work cards and spare parts. | Not rated |
| Mid-Market | 7/10Pricing per plant and single-line pilots suit mid-sized manufacturers. | Not rated |
| Small Business | Not rated | 4/10The 10-interface minimum puts entry spend at about $12,000 a year. |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Fabrico
- Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose Tulip
- Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Fabrico
Pros
- Reviewers on Capterra and G2 rate it about 4.9 out of 5 and praise how easy it is to create, label and assign work orders.
- It combines CMMS and OEE downtime tracking, reading data from PLCs, sensors and cameras, so maintenance and production data sit in one system.
- The Financial Impact module puts a money value on production losses, which few CMMS tools do.
- It holds ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 20000-1 and ISO 9001 certifications and offers AWS hosting in Germany or the USA.
Cons
- There are no public prices. Every deployment is quoted per plant.
- Reviewers say integration setup can require technical knowledge.
- Some reviewers find reporting and service history visualization weak, and the dashboard overwhelming at first.
- It is a young vendor founded in 2022 with about 21 employees and a small review base.
Tulip
Pros
- The no-code drag-and-drop editor lets process engineers build shop-floor apps without developers.
- Billing per interface rather than per user can be cheaper for shop floors with many workers sharing stations.
- Connectors cover OPC UA, MQTT, HTTP, SQL, and USB devices such as scales and barcode scanners.
- The Regulated Industries plan includes 21 CFR Part 11 e-signatures and a validation pack for GxP manufacturers.
- Reviewers report better traceability and real-time visibility after replacing paper processes.
Cons
- The 10-interface minimum and paid add-ons for machine monitoring, vision, and premium support raise first-year cost.
- Reviewers find analytics and table joins limited compared with specialist tools.
- It is cloud SaaS, with no classic full on-premises deployment.
- Custom widgets support only a limited set of JavaScript libraries.
- Enterprise and regulated plan prices are not published.
Not sold on either?
Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Tulip scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7.3/10 against 6.5/10 for Fabrico. The largest gap is in Customization: 6/10 for Fabrico and 9/10 for Tulip.
No, neither Fabrico nor Tulip lists a free plan.
