Cyberhawk vs InspectionWorks Comparison
Compare Cyberhawk vs InspectionWorks features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Cyberhawk
6.5/10
Cyberhawk provides drone inspection services and the iHawk cloud platform. iHawk turns aerial inspection data into geolocated asset models with AI defect detection for utilities and energy operators.
InspectionWorks
5.3/10
InspectionWorks is Waygate Technologies' cloud platform for storing and analyzing non-destructive testing data. It serves asset managers and inspection teams in aerospace MRO and industry.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.5/10 | 5.3/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 3/10 | 4/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| Asset Registry | ||
| Digital Twin | ||
| Inspection Automation | ||
| Condition Monitoring | Not listed | |
| Drone Inspection | Not listed | |
| GIS and Mapping | Not listed | |
| Power Line Inspection | Not listed | |
| Predictive Maintenance | Not listed | |
| Work Orders | Not listed | |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Cyberhawk
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose InspectionWorks
- Higher Cost score (4/10 vs 3/10)
Pros & Cons
Cyberhawk
Pros
- Combines inspection flights by its own pilots with the software, so a utility can outsource the whole inspection program to one vendor.
- Proven at large grid scale, including more than 11,500 SSEN transmission towers and nearly 150 substations.
- The vendor says iHawk connects to EAM, WFM and OMS systems through open APIs.
- Ingests drone, satellite, helicopter, ground camera and IoT sensor data into one map-based view.
- The vendor offers structured onboarding and 24/7 technical support with SLAs.
Cons
- No public pricing and no self-serve or trial tier.
- Very little independent user review coverage, so most claims come from the vendor.
- Mainly aimed at large utilities and energy companies, so it is a poor fit for small teams.
- Ownership changed to Ondas in 2026, which could affect the product roadmap.
InspectionWorks
Pros
- It accepts NDT data from Waygate hardware and from third-party devices, so inspection history from mixed device fleets ends up in one place.
- Analyze provides assisted and automated defect recognition for X-ray, CT and borescope inspections.
- Each asset's full inspection history stays linked to it, which supports long-term records for aviation MROs.
- It is backed by a large NDT hardware maker with roughly 1,500 staff, and Hexagon has agreed to buy that business.
Cons
- No public pricing.
- There are almost no independent user reviews on G2, Capterra or SourceForge.
- Hexagon's pending purchase of Waygate leaves the product roadmap uncertain.
- It has no work order, spare parts or wider maintenance management features.
Not sold on either?
Air Inspection Automation (AiA)Our product
Plans DJI drone inspection missions for power line towers from LiDAR scans: it finds the towers, places photo stops, checks clearance, and splits the route into battery flights.
Made by the team behind b stack radar. Shown here because it fits this topic. It is not part of our rankings. How we rank tools
Frequently Asked Questions
Cyberhawk scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 6.5/10 against 5.3/10 for InspectionWorks. The largest gap is in Support: 8/10 for Cyberhawk and 5/10 for InspectionWorks.
No, neither Cyberhawk nor InspectionWorks lists a free plan.
