Crusoe Cloud vs Rackspace Technology: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Crusoe Cloud and Rackspace Technology to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Crusoe Cloud
6.6/10
Crusoe Cloud is a GPU-focused AI cloud that offers NVIDIA and AMD GPU instances, managed Kubernetes, storage and managed inference to AI teams and enterprises.
Rackspace Technology
6.3/10
Rackspace Technology provides managed multicloud operations, VMware-based private cloud, and the auction-priced Rackspace Spot Kubernetes service, mainly for mid-market and enterprise IT teams.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.6/10 | 6.3/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Scalability | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Multiple Regions | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Crusoe Cloud
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for developers (8/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Rackspace Technology
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
Crusoe Cloud
Pros
- SemiAnalysis gave it a ClusterMAX Gold rating and praised how easy the console is to use, along with its fault management.
- Reviewers describe hands-on, white-glove engineering support.
- It covers NVIDIA H100 through B300 and AMD MI355X GPUs, with InfiniBand clusters.
- CPU, storage and Kubernetes rates are published openly, for example $0.10 per Kubernetes cluster-hour.
- Developers get a CLI, a Terraform provider, an API and an MCP server for automation.
Cons
- There are few independent user reviews on G2, Capterra or Gartner.
- It has fewer managed services and a narrower geographic footprint than the hyperscalers.
- Self-serve GPU rates on the pricing page are set to rise from December 1, 2026.
- Service terms reportedly exclude HIPAA-regulated workloads.
Rackspace Technology
Pros
- Rackspace Spot's auction pricing starts at $0.01 per node-hour, and the free managed Kubernetes control plane makes it cheap for workloads that can tolerate preemption.
- It manages all three major hyperscalers (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) plus VMware private cloud, so one partner can run a hybrid estate.
- Spot can be automated through a Terraform provider, a Go SDK, the spotctl CLI, and an MCP server.
- Enterprise reviewers on Gartner Peer Insights and TrustRadius rate it about 4.5 out of 5, and G2 reviewers praise its uptime.
Cons
- Trustpilot reviews average about 1.2 out of 5, with repeated complaints about billing, price increases, and cancellation handling.
- Managed service, migration, and private cloud pricing is not published and needs a sales quote.
- The 2022 Hosted Exchange security incident, which forced customers to move to Microsoft 365, still weighs on its reputation for reliability.
- Its finances are under pressure: net losses in 2024 and 2025 and a 2026 layoff of about 15 percent of staff could affect service delivery.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Crusoe Cloud scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.6/10 against 6.3/10 for Rackspace Technology. The largest gap is in Support: 8/10 for Crusoe Cloud and 5/10 for Rackspace Technology.
No, neither Crusoe Cloud nor Rackspace Technology lists a free plan.
Crusoe Cloud is the better fit for developers: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 6/10 for Rackspace Technology.
