CrewAI vs Langdock (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
CrewAI and Langdock both score 7.1/10 on our AI Software criteria. Only CrewAI has a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
CrewAI
7.1/10
CrewAI is an open-source Python framework and enterprise platform (AMP) for building, deploying, and governing multi-agent AI workflows. It is used by developers and enterprise platform teams.
Langdock
7.1/10
Langdock is a Berlin-based, EU-hosted AI workspace where company teams chat with many AI models, build custom agents, and automate workflows under central governance.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.1/10 | 7.1/10 |
| Integration | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Output Quality | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | €23.20/user/mo Core |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Basic | €232/mo Core |
| Features | ||
| AI Agents | ||
| API Access | ||
| Chatbots | ||
| Enterprise Controls | ||
| Knowledge Base Search | ||
| Private Deployment | ||
| Text Generation | ||
| Workflow Automation | ||
| Code Generation | Not listed | |
| Transcription | Not listed | |
CrewAI vs Langdock cost by team size
| Team size | CrewAI | Langdock |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeBasic | €23/moCore |
| 5 users | FreeBasic | €116/moCore |
| 10 users | FreeBasic | €232/moCore |
| 25 users | FreeBasic | €580/moCore |
| 50 users | FreeBasic | €1,160/moCore |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who CrewAI and Langdock suit
CrewAI fits developers and startups better than Langdock.
| Audience | CrewAI | Langdock |
|---|---|---|
| Developers | 9/10The core product is a Python framework with code-level control over agents, tools, and flows, and it has more than 60k GitHub stars. | 6/10An EU-hosted unified API with per-token billing lets developers call the same models. |
| Startups | 7/10The free, open-source framework and the free Basic cloud tier make prototyping cheap, but no mid-priced paid tier is published. | 4/10There is no free tier, only a 7-day trial, and the product targets mid-sized and large organisations. |
| Enterprise | 8/10The Enterprise plan adds SSO, RBAC, PII redaction, VPC or self-hosted deployment, and onboarding, and the vendor cites Fortune 500 customers such as DocuSign and PepsiCo. | 9/10Langdock offers SSO and SCIM, governance, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliance, and dedicated or on-premise deployments for large seat counts. |
| Small Business | 4/10Most of the value requires Python skills, and the jump from 50 free executions to custom Enterprise pricing is awkward for small firms. | 5/10Small teams can use it, but reviewers say per-seat pricing feels steep for very small teams. |
| IT Teams | 7/10Central governance, RBAC, and deployment controls are aimed at platform and IT teams that manage agents across a company. | 7/10SSO, SCIM, SAML and central governance let IT teams roll out AI to staff in a controlled way. |
| Consultancies | Not rated | 7/10EU hosting, multi-model access and document-based agents suit knowledge work on confidential client material. |
| Financial Services | Not rated | 6/10ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and EU hosting suit regulated organisations, though no banks or insurers are named. |
| Freelancers | Not rated | 3/10There is no free tier, and the product is built around team governance rather than solo use. |
| Government | Not rated | 5/10EU hosting and on-premise options for large deployments support public-sector data rules, but no government customers are named. |
| Mid-Market | Not rated | 8/10Per-seat plans with volume discounts and included workflow runs fit companies of a few hundred staff. |
| Operations Teams | Not rated | 5/10The workflow layer chains AI steps into automations, but reviewers say many actions still need humans. |
| Remote Teams | Not rated | 4/10Integrations with Slack and Microsoft 365 help, but the notes describe no remote-specific features. |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose CrewAI
- Has a free plan (Langdock does not)
- Higher Cost score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for startups (7/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Langdock
- Higher Scalability score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Security score (9/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
CrewAI
Pros
- The core framework is MIT-licensed and free to self-host, so teams can prototype multi-agent systems without licensing costs.
- The role-based Crews model and the event-driven Flows model give developers a clear structure, with sequential and hierarchical task processes.
- It works with most LLMs through LiteLLM or native providers, and it supports MCP servers, A2A, and more than 40 built-in tools.
- AMP includes OAuth-based connectors for Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, and Gmail, plus REST API and webhook triggers.
- Enterprise buyers can deploy in their own VPC or on their own infrastructure, with SSO, RBAC, and PII redaction.
Cons
- No public price exists between the free 50-execution Basic tier and a custom Enterprise quote.
- Reviewers report heavy token use, because every agent step is an LLM call and multi-agent crews add to the cost.
- Python knowledge is effectively required, and reviewers describe the learning curve as steep for newcomers.
- Independent reviews say long-running pause and resume, horizontal scaling, and error recovery need custom work.
- Smaller open-source models, around 7B parameters, reportedly struggle with CrewAI's function calling.
- Compliance claims (SOC 2 type, HIPAA) vary between third-party sources and should be confirmed directly with the vendor.
Langdock
Pros
- Access to 40+ models from several providers in one interface, so teams can switch models without buying separate ChatGPT and Claude licences.
- Strong EU compliance posture: ISO 27001 certification, a SOC 2 Type II audit, GDPR compliance and EU hosting on Azure.
- SSO, SCIM and SAML are included even on the entry Core plan.
- Non-technical staff can build no-code agents with their own knowledge bases and permissions.
- Deployment options range from multi-tenant SaaS to single-tenant, bring-your-own-cloud and on-premise Kubernetes.
Cons
- There is no permanent free tier, only a 7-day trial.
- Dedicated and on-premise deployments require 2,000 to 5,000+ seats.
- Reviewers say its workflows still leave many actions to humans, so automation of operational tasks is limited.
- Building advanced agents has a learning curve.
- Per-seat pricing with Max seat upgrades and workflow add-ons can get expensive for small teams.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
CrewAI and Langdock both score 7.1/10 on our AI Software criteria. The largest gap is in Cost: 7/10 for CrewAI and 5/10 for Langdock.
CrewAI has a free plan; Langdock does not list one.
CrewAI is the better fit for developers: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 6/10 for Langdock.
