Coda vs Mattermost: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Coda and Mattermost to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Coda
6.8/10
Coda, now sold as Superhuman Docs, is a doc-plus-database workspace where teams build project trackers, wikis and internal tools with tables, formulas and automations.
Mattermost
6.7/10
Self-hostable, open-source team messaging and workflow platform with playbooks, kanban boards and AI agents, built for security-conscious and regulated organizations.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.8/10 | 6.7/10 |
| Integration | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 6/10 | 3/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 9/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 10/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | $12/user/mo Pro | $10/user/mo Professional |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free | Free Team Edition |
| Features | ||
| Scheduling | Not listed | |
| Databases | Not listed | |
| Docs | Not listed | |
| Spreadsheet interface | Not listed | |
| App integrations | ||
| Task lists | ||
| Timeline view | Not listed | |
| Task management | Not listed | |
| Workflow automation | ||
| Dashboards | Not listed | |
| Kanban boards | ||
| Collaboration tools | ||
| Knowledge base | Not listed | |
| Team messaging | Not listed | |
| File sharing | Not listed | |
| Client collaboration | Not listed | |
Coda vs Mattermost cost by team size
Coda and Mattermost cost the same at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Coda | Mattermost |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree | FreeTeam Edition |
| 5 users | FreeFree | FreeTeam Edition |
| 10 users | FreeFree | FreeTeam Edition |
| 25 users | FreeFree | FreeTeam Edition |
| 50 users | FreeFree | FreeTeam Edition |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Coda
- Higher Analytics score (6/10 vs 3/10)
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for small business (7/10 vs 4/10)
- Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose Mattermost
- Higher Scalability score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Security score (10/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for developers (8/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
Coda
Pros
- Combines pages, relational tables, buttons and automations, so one doc can replace several tools such as a tracker, a wiki and a form tool.
- Only Doc Makers are billed, so stakeholders who only edit or view content join for free.
- Packs connect to more than 600 services, and automations can chain actions across Slack, email and external APIs.
- Non-developers can build working internal tools quickly. One reviewer built a bug-to-Jira workflow in about 45 minutes.
- Tables can be viewed as a grid, kanban board, calendar, form or detail view.
Cons
- Steep learning curve. The formula syntax is unique to Coda and its error messages are weak.
- Large docs with many pages or complex tables can lag.
- Costs rise quickly when most team members need maker access. A 10-maker Team plan costs about $4,320 a year.
- Mobile apps are weak for building or editing complex docs.
- Ownership and branding have shifted (Grammarly, then Superhuman), and one source says new buyers must purchase a suite tier.
Mattermost
Pros
- Can be fully self-hosted or air-gapped, which suits defense, government and regulated industries
- Enterprise tiers include strong compliance tooling: FIPS 140-3 builds, legal hold, compliance export and granular RBAC
- Playbooks give incident and DevOps teams repeatable checklists with automated triggers inside chat
- Built-in Jira, GitHub and GitLab integrations, plus an open API for custom bots
- Open-source core under MIT and AGPL licenses avoids full vendor lock-in
Cons
- The Boards kanban plugin is in maintenance mode and has been removed from the in-product marketplace
- Since v11 the free Entry plan shows only the last 10,000 messages and Team Edition is capped at 250 users, which drew community criticism
- The vendor publishes no prices, licenses are annual prepaid only, and every server needs its own license
- No Gantt charts, time tracking or project reporting, so it cannot replace a dedicated project management tool
- Self-hosting requires admin time and server upkeep
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Coda scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 6.7/10 for Mattermost. The largest gap is in Analytics: 6/10 for Coda and 3/10 for Mattermost.
Both are free for 10 users.
Yes, both Coda and Mattermost have a free plan.
Mattermost is the better fit for developers: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 5/10 for Coda.
