Cloud4Y vs Google Kubernetes Engine: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Cloud4Y and Google Kubernetes Engine to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026

Cloud4Y
5.9/10
Russian cloud provider offering VMware-based cloud servers, GPU servers, dedicated hardware, Kubernetes, S3 storage, backup and disaster recovery for businesses that need data kept in Russia.
Google Kubernetes Engine
7.1/10
Google Cloud's managed Kubernetes service. It runs containerized workloads in Standard or Autopilot mode for engineering teams of any size.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | G Google Kubernetes Engine |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 5.9/10 | 7.1/10 |
| Analytics | 4/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 9/10 |
| Security | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | $73/mo GKE Standard / Autopilot cluster |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Free Free tier credit |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Uptime SLA | ||
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed WordPress | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
Cloud4Y vs Google Kubernetes Engine cost by team size
| Team size | Cloud4Y | Google Kubernetes Engine |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | FreeFree tier credit |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | FreeFree tier credit |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | FreeFree tier credit |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | FreeFree tier credit |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | FreeFree tier credit |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Cloud4Y

- Higher Support score (6/10 vs 5/10)
GWhy choose Google Kubernetes Engine
- Has a free plan (Cloud4Y does not)
- Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Integration score (8/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
Cloud4Y

Pros
- Compliance credentials for Russian regulated data: ISO 27001, PCI DSS, FZ-152, and FSTEC and FSB licenses
- Hourly pay-as-you-go billing with deferred payment terms for business customers
- Wide portfolio covering GPU servers, Kubernetes, S3 storage, DRaaS and StormWall DDoS protection
- 99.982% base SLA, with 99.99% possible on geo-replicated setups
- Automation through an API, Terraform and a CLI on a familiar VMware and Veeam stack
Cons
- Reviewers call it expensive compared with international and local competitors
- Prices exclude VAT, and add-ons make monthly bills hard to predict
- Some plans cap technical support hours each month
- Short refund window and no money-back guarantee
- Very few independent user reviews on major review sites
GGoogle Kubernetes Engine
Pros
- Autopilot mode removes node management and bills only for the resources pods request, so unscheduled pods and system overhead are not charged.
- The $74.40 monthly credit pays the management fee for one zonal or Autopilot cluster.
- Comparison articles rate its setup the simplest of GKE, EKS, and AKS, and its hybrid and multi-cloud tooling the most mature.
- Since September 2025, fleet management and policy tools come with Standard at no extra cost.
- G2 reviewers give it an average of about 4.5 stars and praise the stability of the managed control plane.
Cons
- Every cluster pays about $73 a month in management fees, while AKS's standard tier control plane is free.
- Load balancers, storage, and network egress are billed separately, so reviewers find total costs hard to forecast.
- Users report a steep Kubernetes learning curve, and advanced tuning still takes real expertise.
- Reviewers describe support as mixed, especially for clusters on older Kubernetes versions.
- Forum threads describe Autopilot problems such as pods being preempted and scale-up and scale-down loops.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Google Kubernetes Engine scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.1/10 against 5.9/10 for Cloud4Y. The largest gap is in Analytics: 4/10 for Cloud4Y and 7/10 for Google Kubernetes Engine.
Google Kubernetes Engine has a free plan; Cloud4Y does not list one.




