Civo vs Latitude.sh: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Civo and Latitude.sh to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Civo
6.7/10
Civo is a UK cloud provider offering fast managed Kubernetes on K3s, compute instances, managed databases, object storage and GPUs for developer teams.
Latitude.sh
6.8/10
Bare metal cloud provider that offers dedicated servers, GPU servers and virtual machines on demand, billed hourly or monthly, for developers and infrastructure-heavy businesses.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.7/10 | 6.8/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $5/mo Compute instances | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $5/mo Compute instances | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
Civo vs Latitude.sh cost by team size
Civo costs less at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Civo | Latitude.sh |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $5/moCompute instances | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
| 5 users | $5/moCompute instances | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
| 10 users | $5/moCompute instances | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
| 25 users | $5/moCompute instances | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
| 50 users | $5/moCompute instances | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Civo
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: $5/mo vs $18/mo
- Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for startups (9/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose Latitude.sh
- Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Support score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (7/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
Civo
Pros
- The Kubernetes control plane is free, and clusters launch in about 90 seconds.
- Ingress and egress bandwidth are free and unlimited, which avoids surprise transfer bills.
- Pricing is published and billed hourly, with nodes starting at $5.43 a month.
- Resources can be managed through a CLI, a REST API, Terraform and Pulumi, plus a marketplace of over 100 apps.
- It holds ISO 27001, SOC 2 and Cyber Essentials Plus, and it is a UK G-Cloud supplier.
Cons
- It offers far fewer managed services and regions than the hyperscalers.
- Reviewers describe the documentation as limited or uneven.
- Very few independent reviews exist; G2 has none and Gartner has one.
- No core-platform SLA or 24/7 support matrix is clearly published.
- Observability tooling is basic.
Latitude.sh
Pros
- Prices for every metal, GPU and VM plan are listed publicly, with hourly rates as well as monthly ones.
- Each listed plan includes 20 TB of outbound bandwidth, and inbound traffic is unlimited.
- Servers are offered in 26 locations, including several in Latin America such as Sao Paulo, Bogota, Santiago, Buenos Aires and Mexico City.
- Servers can be automated through the API, SDKs, CLI and a Terraform provider.
- Current-generation AMD EPYC hardware runs alongside B300, RTX PRO 6000 and H100 GPU options.
Cons
- There is no managed WordPress, managed database or serverless offering, so you need operations expertise.
- Independent user reviews are scarce, and PeerSpot shows no reviews at all.
- Bandwidth overage rates and storage prices are not shown on the main pricing page.
- The Megaport acquisition may change the roadmap over time, although Latitude.sh says the brand and billing stay the same.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Latitude.sh scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 6.7/10 for Civo. The largest gap is in Cost: 9/10 for Civo and 6/10 for Latitude.sh.
Civo costs less for 10 users: about $5/mo on its Compute instances plan, against about $18/mo on its Virtual Machine vm.micro plan for Latitude.sh, billed monthly.
No, neither Civo nor Latitude.sh lists a free plan.
Latitude.sh is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 7/10 for them, against 5/10 for Civo.
