Civo vs Crusoe Cloud: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Civo and Crusoe Cloud to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Civo
6.7/10
Civo is a UK cloud provider offering fast managed Kubernetes on K3s, compute instances, managed databases, object storage and GPUs for developer teams.
Crusoe Cloud
6.6/10
Crusoe Cloud is a GPU-focused AI cloud that offers NVIDIA and AMD GPU instances, managed Kubernetes, storage and managed inference to AI teams and enterprises.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.7/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Analytics | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $5/mo Compute instances | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $5/mo Compute instances | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Multiple Regions | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | ||
| Managed Kubernetes | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
Civo vs Crusoe Cloud cost by team size
| Team size | Civo | Crusoe Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $5/moCompute instances | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | $5/moCompute instances | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | $5/moCompute instances | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | $5/moCompute instances | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | $5/moCompute instances | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Civo
- Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose Crusoe Cloud
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Scalability score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (8/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
Civo
Pros
- The Kubernetes control plane is free, and clusters launch in about 90 seconds.
- Ingress and egress bandwidth are free and unlimited, which avoids surprise transfer bills.
- Pricing is published and billed hourly, with nodes starting at $5.43 a month.
- Resources can be managed through a CLI, a REST API, Terraform and Pulumi, plus a marketplace of over 100 apps.
- It holds ISO 27001, SOC 2 and Cyber Essentials Plus, and it is a UK G-Cloud supplier.
Cons
- It offers far fewer managed services and regions than the hyperscalers.
- Reviewers describe the documentation as limited or uneven.
- Very few independent reviews exist; G2 has none and Gartner has one.
- No core-platform SLA or 24/7 support matrix is clearly published.
- Observability tooling is basic.
Crusoe Cloud
Pros
- SemiAnalysis gave it a ClusterMAX Gold rating and praised how easy the console is to use, along with its fault management.
- Reviewers describe hands-on, white-glove engineering support.
- It covers NVIDIA H100 through B300 and AMD MI355X GPUs, with InfiniBand clusters.
- CPU, storage and Kubernetes rates are published openly, for example $0.10 per Kubernetes cluster-hour.
- Developers get a CLI, a Terraform provider, an API and an MCP server for automation.
Cons
- There are few independent user reviews on G2, Capterra or Gartner.
- It has fewer managed services and a narrower geographic footprint than the hyperscalers.
- Self-serve GPU rates on the pricing page are set to rise from December 1, 2026.
- Service terms reportedly exclude HIPAA-regulated workloads.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Civo scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.7/10 against 6.6/10 for Crusoe Cloud. The largest gap is in Cost: 9/10 for Civo and 6/10 for Crusoe Cloud.
No, neither Civo nor Crusoe Cloud lists a free plan.
Crusoe Cloud is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 5/10 for Civo.
