Cherry Servers vs Linode (Akamai Cloud): Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of Cherry Servers and Linode (Akamai Cloud) to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
Cherry Servers
6.7/10
Lithuanian infrastructure provider renting bare metal dedicated servers, GPU servers and virtual servers with hourly billing and API automation to developers and businesses.
Linode (Akamai Cloud)
7/10
Developer-focused cloud platform, now run by Akamai, offering VPS compute, managed Kubernetes, managed databases and object storage at flat, predictable prices.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.7/10 | 7/10 |
| Integration | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Reliability | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Analytics | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | $5/mo Nanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | $5/mo Nanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Automatic Backups | ||
| Cloud Compute | ||
| DDoS Protection | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Uptime SLA | ||
| VPS Hosting | ||
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
Cherry Servers vs Linode (Akamai Cloud) cost by team size
| Team size | Cherry Servers | Linode (Akamai Cloud) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | $5/moNanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | $5/moNanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | $5/moNanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | $5/moNanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | $5/moNanode 1 GB (Shared CPU) |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Cherry Servers
- Higher Support score (8/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Linode (Akamai Cloud)
- Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
Cherry Servers
Pros
- Hourly, fixed-term and spot billing for bare metal, which is uncommon among dedicated server hosts
- Reviewers repeatedly praise fast responses from human support staff
- Backup storage is free with dedicated servers
- An open-source Terraform provider and REST API support infrastructure-as-code workflows
- Seven or more locations across Europe, the US and Asia
Cons
- The pricing page lists no managed Kubernetes, managed databases or object storage
- Some users report higher-than-expected latency on long-distance network routes
- DDoS protection is only listed as an option for floating IPs
- Server prices are shown hourly, which makes monthly cost comparisons harder
Linode (Akamai Cloud)
Pros
- Flat published prices, starting at 5 dollars a month for a 1 GB Nanode, with hourly billing
- The standard Kubernetes control plane in LKE is free
- Egress overage costs only 0.005 dollars per GB, and most shared plans include 1 to 5 TB of transfer
- Its documentation, API, CLI and Terraform support are strong, which suits developers who automate their infrastructure
- DDoS protection is included, and inbound bandwidth is 40 Gbps on all plans
Cons
- Some 2025 reviews report new accounts flagged as fraud or suspended, with tickets taking 24 to 48 hours
- No live chat support is offered, and standard support has no published response-time SLA
- Reviewers say managed services and advanced enterprise features are fewer than on the hyperscalers
- Managed databases cost more than on budget providers, with HA starting around 246 dollars a month according to one third-party guide
- The Akamai rebrand has confused some customers and, by their account, hurt trust
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Linode (Akamai Cloud) scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7/10 against 6.7/10 for Cherry Servers. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 6/10 for Cherry Servers and 8/10 for Linode (Akamai Cloud).
No, neither Cherry Servers nor Linode (Akamai Cloud) lists a free plan.
