BlazingCDN vs Northflank: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of BlazingCDN and Northflank to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
BlazingCDN
5.9/10
BlazingCDN is a low-cost CDN from an EU-based company. It delivers static files, software downloads, video on demand and HLS streams for software, gaming and OTT businesses.
Northflank
7.2/10
Northflank is a Kubernetes-based developer platform for deploying services, jobs, databases and GPU workloads on its managed cloud or on customers' own cloud accounts.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 5.9/10 | 7.2/10 |
| Integration | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 4/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Reliability | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | $25/mo FLEX (pay-as-you-go) | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $25/mo FLEX (pay-as-you-go) | Free Sandbox |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Free SSL Certificates | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Git Deployments | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
BlazingCDN vs Northflank cost by team size
Northflank costs less at every team size we checked.
| Team size | BlazingCDN | Northflank |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) | FreeSandbox |
| 5 users | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) | FreeSandbox |
| 10 users | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) | FreeSandbox |
| 25 users | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) | FreeSandbox |
| 50 users | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) | FreeSandbox |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose BlazingCDN
- Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose Northflank
- Has a free plan (BlazingCDN does not)
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: Free vs $25/mo
- Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 7/10)
Pros & Cons
BlazingCDN
Pros
- Bandwidth starts at $5 per TB and falls to $2.50 per TB at petabyte volume, with requests not billed.
- No contract and no setup fee, with a $25 monthly minimum and payment by card, PayPal, bank transfer or invoice.
- Strong video content protection, including signed URLs, security tokens, per-copy fingerprinting and IP binding.
- Developer tooling includes a REST API, Prometheus metrics and an official MCP server with 52 tools.
- Support is available 24/7, and the vendor promises an engineer reply within 3 business hours.
- EU-headquartered with GDPR-compliant processing and EU invoicing.
Cons
- The vendor says it has no edge functions, HTTP/3, WebSockets or video transcoding.
- Third-party listings show no WAF, load balancing or multi-CDN switching.
- There is no free plan, and the 14-day testing period is billed at $5 per TB.
- No uptime SLA or PoP count is published.
- Almost no independent reviews exist; G2 shows none.
Northflank
Pros
- Per-second usage billing with no seat or workspace fees. Northflank's own comparison prices a 2 vCPU, 4 GB service at $48 a month, against $85 at Render.
- The same platform can run workloads in your own AWS, GCP, Azure or Civo account, or on imported Kubernetes clusters, so moving off the managed cloud does not mean switching tools.
- G2 reviewers praise fast support from engineers who know the product.
- Builds from GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket are built in, and preview environments are created for each pull request.
- GPU options run from L4 to B200, so AI workloads can sit next to ordinary services.
Cons
- SLAs, SSO, SCIM, audit logs and the WAF are only available on Enterprise.
- G2 reviewers mention a limited choice of regions and slow builds because local Docker caching is missing.
- Some Trustpilot reviewers report slow support, and the review base is small overall.
- The vendor's pricing and features pages carry a notice about a security incident and ask users to rotate their credentials.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Northflank scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.2/10 against 5.9/10 for BlazingCDN. The largest gap is in Customization: 4/10 for BlazingCDN and 8/10 for Northflank.
Northflank costs less for 10 users: free on its Sandbox plan, against about $25/mo on its FLEX (pay-as-you-go) plan for BlazingCDN, billed monthly.
Northflank has a free plan; BlazingCDN does not list one.
Northflank is the better fit for developers: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for BlazingCDN.
