BlazingCDN vs Latitude.sh: Complete Comparison (2026)
An in-depth comparison of BlazingCDN and Latitude.sh to help you choose the right tool for your business.
Last updated: November 2026
BlazingCDN
5.9/10
BlazingCDN is a low-cost CDN from an EU-based company. It delivers static files, software downloads, video on demand and HLS streams for software, gaming and OTT businesses.
Latitude.sh
6.9/10
Bare metal cloud provider that offers dedicated servers, GPU servers and virtual machines on demand, billed hourly or monthly, for developers and infrastructure-heavy businesses.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 5.9/10 | 6.9/10 |
| Integration | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 4/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Reliability | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $25/mo FLEX (pay-as-you-go) | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | $25/mo FLEX (pay-as-you-go) | $18/mo Virtual Machine vm.micro |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Free SSL Certificates | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
BlazingCDN vs Latitude.sh cost by team size
Latitude.sh costs less at every team size we checked.
| Team size | BlazingCDN | Latitude.sh |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
| 5 users | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
| 10 users | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
| 25 users | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
| 50 users | $25/moFLEX (pay-as-you-go) | $18/moVirtual Machine vm.micro |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose BlazingCDN
- Higher Cost score (9/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose Latitude.sh
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: $18/mo vs $25/mo
- Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (7/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
BlazingCDN
Pros
- Bandwidth starts at $5 per TB and falls to $2.50 per TB at petabyte volume, with requests not billed.
- No contract and no setup fee, with a $25 monthly minimum and payment by card, PayPal, bank transfer or invoice.
- Strong video content protection, including signed URLs, security tokens, per-copy fingerprinting and IP binding.
- Developer tooling includes a REST API, Prometheus metrics and an official MCP server with 52 tools.
- Support is available 24/7, and the vendor promises an engineer reply within 3 business hours.
- EU-headquartered with GDPR-compliant processing and EU invoicing.
Cons
- The vendor says it has no edge functions, HTTP/3, WebSockets or video transcoding.
- Third-party listings show no WAF, load balancing or multi-CDN switching.
- There is no free plan, and the 14-day testing period is billed at $5 per TB.
- No uptime SLA or PoP count is published.
- Almost no independent reviews exist; G2 shows none.
Latitude.sh
Pros
- Prices for every metal, GPU and VM plan are listed publicly, with hourly rates as well as monthly ones.
- Each listed plan includes 20 TB of outbound bandwidth, and inbound traffic is unlimited.
- Servers are offered in 26 locations, including several in Latin America such as Sao Paulo, Bogota, Santiago, Buenos Aires and Mexico City.
- Servers can be automated through the API, SDKs, CLI and a Terraform provider.
- Current-generation AMD EPYC hardware runs alongside B300, RTX PRO 6000 and H100 GPU options.
Cons
- There is no managed WordPress, managed database or serverless offering, so you need operations expertise.
- Independent user reviews are scarce, and PeerSpot shows no reviews at all.
- Bandwidth overage rates and storage prices are not shown on the main pricing page.
- The Megaport acquisition may change the roadmap over time, although Latitude.sh says the brand and billing stay the same.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Latitude.sh scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 6.9/10 against 5.9/10 for BlazingCDN. The largest gap is in Customization: 4/10 for BlazingCDN and 8/10 for Latitude.sh.
Latitude.sh costs less for 10 users: about $18/mo on its Virtual Machine vm.micro plan, against about $25/mo on its FLEX (pay-as-you-go) plan for BlazingCDN, billed monthly.
No, neither BlazingCDN nor Latitude.sh lists a free plan.
Latitude.sh is the better fit for developers: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for BlazingCDN.
