b stack radar

Balto vs Cresta Comparison

Compare Balto vs Cresta features, pricing, and more.

Last updated: November 2026

Balto logo

Balto

6.9/10

Winner

Balto is a contact center AI platform. It gives live agents real-time guidance and automates QA scoring, coaching and call notes. It also offers an AI voice agent called Togo.

Cresta logo

Cresta

6.8/10

Cresta is an enterprise contact center AI platform that provides autonomous AI agents, real-time agent assist, conversation intelligence and automated quality management.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Balto logo
Balto
Cresta logo
Cresta
Scores
Overall Rating6.9/106.8/10
Integration8/107/10
Analytics7/109/10
Customization6/108/10
Ease of Use8/106/10
Support8/106/10
Cost4/103/10
Scalability7/109/10
Security8/109/10
Output Quality7/107/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricingContact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricingContact for pricing
Features
AI Agents
Data Analysis
Knowledge Base Search
Text Generation
Transcription
Voice and Audio
ChatbotsNot listed
Custom Model TrainingNot listed
Workflow AutomationNot listed

Which One Should You Choose?

Balto logo
Why choose Balto

  • Higher Ease of Use score (8/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Support score (8/10 vs 6/10)

Cresta logo
Why choose Cresta

  • Higher Analytics score (9/10 vs 7/10)
  • Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for enterprise (9/10 vs 7/10)

Pros & Cons

Balto logo
Balto

Pros

  • Live prompts, knowledge answers and disclosure reminders reach agents during calls rather than in after-call review.
  • More than 60 prebuilt integrations with telephony and CRM systems such as Five9, Genesys, NICE and Salesforce.
  • Claims SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, PCI DSS and GDPR compliance, which matters for regulated contact centers.
  • Rated about 4.8 out of 5 from roughly 590 G2 reviews, with praise for call summarization and onboarding support.
  • The vendor says most customers go live within 30 days.

Cons

  • No public pricing. Every deal goes through a sales demo.
  • G2 reviewers report missed phrases and inaccurate speech recognition.
  • Some reviewers mention app timeouts, blank screens and lag in the prompts.
  • Contracts reportedly auto-renew annually with an 8% price uplift unless cancelled 30 days in advance.
  • Teams that work mainly in chat or email get less value than voice-heavy centers.

Cresta logo
Cresta

Pros

  • Gives agents real-time guidance and knowledge answers during live calls and chats, which G2 reviewers single out as a strength.
  • Scores and analyses every conversation automatically instead of a manual sample.
  • Models are trained on the customer's own conversation data, so guidance reflects the company's own top performers.
  • Unusually broad compliance coverage, including SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, PCI-DSS, HIPAA and ISO/IEC 42001.

Cons

  • No public pricing, free tier or self-serve trial; buying requires a sales cycle and usually a paid pilot.
  • Model training and tuning can take months before the value shows.
  • A few G2 reviewers report inaccurate AI suggestions or poor understanding of conversations.
  • Generally economical only for contact centers with about 100 or more agents.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Balto scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.9/10 against 6.8/10 for Cresta. The largest gap is in Analytics: 7/10 for Balto and 9/10 for Cresta.

No, neither Balto nor Cresta lists a free plan.

Cresta is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for Balto.

Related Comparisons