b stack radar

AWS Amplify vs ScalaHosting (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict

AWS Amplify is our pick, scoring 7.2/10 against 6.1/10 for ScalaHosting on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Integration score (9/10 vs 5/10). For 10 users, AWS Amplify is free, against $25/mo for ScalaHosting; only AWS Amplify has a free plan.

Last updated: November 2026

A

AWS Amplify

7.2/10

Winner

AWS Amplify is a pay-as-you-go platform from Amazon Web Services for hosting web apps from Git and building full-stack backends on AWS.

ScalaHosting logo

ScalaHosting

6.1/10

Web hosting provider selling shared, managed cloud VPS and self-managed cloud VPS plans, built around its own SPanel control panel and SShield security tool.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
A
AWS Amplify
ScalaHosting logo
ScalaHosting
Scores
Overall Rating7.2/106.1/10
Integration9/105/10
Support5/107/10
Cost7/106/10
Customization7/106/10
Security8/107/10
Reliability8/107/10
Ease of Use5/107/10
Analytics6/104/10
Scalability9/105/10
Pricing
Free planYesNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricing$24.95/mo
Self-Managed Cloud Config 1
Estimated cost for 10 usersFree
Free Tier
$25/mo
Self-Managed Cloud Config 1
Features
Content Delivery Network
Free SSL Certificates
Multiple Regions
Uptime SLA
API and CLINot listed
Automatic BackupsNot listed
Git DeploymentsNot listed
Managed DatabasesNot listed
Object StorageNot listed
Serverless FunctionsNot listed
Shared HostingNot listed
VPS HostingNot listed

AWS Amplify vs ScalaHosting cost by team size

AWS Amplify costs less at every team size we checked.

Team sizeAWS AmplifyScalaHosting
1 userFreeFree Tier$25/moSelf-Managed Cloud Config 1
5 usersFreeFree Tier$25/moSelf-Managed Cloud Config 1
10 usersFreeFree Tier$25/moSelf-Managed Cloud Config 1
25 usersFreeFree Tier$25/moSelf-Managed Cloud Config 1
50 usersFreeFree Tier$25/moSelf-Managed Cloud Config 1

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Who AWS Amplify and ScalaHosting suit

AWS Amplify fits developers better; ScalaHosting fits small business better.

AudienceAWS AmplifyScalaHosting
Small Business4/10Setup and IAM complexity make it harder for non-technical small teams than simpler hosts.8/10Shared and managed VPS plans come with free migration, backups, SSL and support for the server stack, aimed at owners without in-house admins.
Developers8/10Built for front-end and full-stack developers, with a TypeScript backend, framework libraries and Git-based CI/CD, though it takes AWS knowledge.6/10Self-managed cloud VPS plans give root access and a choice of operating system, and SPanel adds SSH, WP-CLI and Git, but there is no infrastructure API or Terraform support.
AgenciesNot rated7/10Managed VPS plans add client permission roles, collaborators, white labeling and WHMCS integration for reselling client sites.
E-commerceNot rated6/10Plans are marketed as ecommerce-enabled on PCI-compliant infrastructure, though the entry cloud tier has limited RAM.
Enterprise7/10Compliance programs including SOC, PCI, ISO and HIPAA, WAF integration and IAM controls suit organisations standardised on AWS.Not rated
FreelancersNot rated7/10A user review describes a developer running client sites and a WooCommerce store on one account, managed through SPanel.
SaaS Companies7/10Wildcard subdomains, Cognito auth and real-time AppSync data support multi-tenant SaaS apps on AWS.Not rated
Startups7/10No seat fees and a 12-month free tier help early teams, but reports of surprise charges call for watching billing closely.Not rated

Which One Should You Choose?

A
Why choose AWS Amplify

  • Has a free plan (ScalaHosting does not)
  • Lower estimated cost for 10 users: Free vs $25/mo
  • Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Scalability score (9/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for developers (8/10 vs 6/10)

ScalaHosting logo
Why choose ScalaHosting

  • Higher Support score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for small business (8/10 vs 4/10)

Pros & Cons

A
AWS Amplify

Pros

  • No per-seat fees: team access is free and you pay only for builds, storage, transfer and SSR usage.
  • Gen 2 lets developers define Cognito auth, AppSync and DynamoDB data and Lambda functions in TypeScript, then extend them with any AWS resource through the CDK.
  • Git branches map to environments, pull requests can get preview deployments, and deployments are atomic.
  • AWS publishes a 99.95% monthly uptime SLA with tiered service credits.
  • Amplify is in scope for SOC, PCI, ISO, HIPAA, HITRUST and other AWS compliance programs, and integrates with AWS WAF.

Cons

  • Reviewers on G2 and Capterra say the learning curve is steep and debugging complex apps is hard.
  • Comparison articles say IAM setup and configuration are much heavier than on Vercel or Netlify.
  • Next.js support has documented gaps: no on-demand ISR, no Edge API routes, a 5.72 MB response size cap and a 220 MB build output limit for SSR apps.
  • Bills spread across many AWS services are hard to predict, and some users report unexpected charges from resources left running.
  • Some reviewers find Gen 2 restrictive when an app strays from its expected path, and the Gen 1 versus Gen 2 split confuses them.

ScalaHosting logo
ScalaHosting

Pros

  • SPanel is included free on managed VPS plans, so customers avoid cPanel licence fees that other VPS hosts pass on.
  • Managed VPS plans include daily offsite backups, a dedicated IP, SShield malware and brute-force protection, and free migrations at no extra cost.
  • An anytime money-back guarantee refunds unused time, with a full refund in the first 30 days for web, reseller and VPS hosting.
  • Resources can be scaled one component at a time (CPU, RAM, storage) with clear per-unit add-on prices.
  • Strong user ratings, with about 4.8 on G2 and 4.9 on Trustpilot from thousands of reviews.

Cons

  • Renewal prices are roughly two to four times the intro rates, and the lowest prices need a 36-month prepayment.
  • Billing and pre-sales support is not 24/7, and there is no phone support.
  • Only three company-owned data centers. Other regions run on partner clouds.
  • There is no infrastructure API, Terraform provider, managed Kubernetes or object storage, which limits it for developer platform use.
  • WPBeginner's tests found slower page loads than several shared-hosting rivals on the entry cloud plan.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

AWS Amplify scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.2/10 against 6.1/10 for ScalaHosting. The largest gap is in Integration: 9/10 for AWS Amplify and 5/10 for ScalaHosting.

AWS Amplify costs less for 10 users: free on its Free Tier plan, against about $25/mo on its Self-Managed Cloud Config 1 plan for ScalaHosting, billed monthly.

AWS Amplify has a free plan; ScalaHosting does not list one.

ScalaHosting is the better fit for small business: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 4/10 for AWS Amplify.

Related Comparisons