b stack radar

AWS Amplify vs Google App Engine (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict

AWS Amplify is our pick, scoring 7.2/10 against 7.1/10 for Google App Engine on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Customization score (7/10 vs 5/10). For 10 users, AWS Amplify and Google App Engine are both free; both AWS Amplify and Google App Engine have a free plan.

Last updated: November 2026

A

AWS Amplify

7.2/10

Winner

AWS Amplify is a pay-as-you-go platform from Amazon Web Services for hosting web apps from Git and building full-stack backends on AWS.

G

Google App Engine

7.1/10

Google App Engine is a fully managed platform for deploying web apps and APIs on Google Cloud, with automatic scaling and no server management.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
A
AWS Amplify
G
Google App Engine
Scores
Overall Rating7.2/107.1/10
Integration9/108/10
Support5/105/10
Cost7/106/10
Customization7/105/10
Security8/108/10
Reliability8/108/10
Ease of Use5/107/10
Analytics6/107/10
Scalability9/109/10
Pricing
Free planYesYes
Cheapest paid planContact for pricingContact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersFree
Free Tier
Free
Standard environment free quota
Features
API and CLI
Free SSL Certificates
Managed Databases
Multiple Regions
Serverless Functions
Content Delivery NetworkNot listed
Dedicated ServersNot listed
Git DeploymentsNot listed
Managed WordPressNot listed
Object StorageNot listed
Shared HostingNot listed
Uptime SLANot listed

AWS Amplify vs Google App Engine cost by team size

AWS Amplify and Google App Engine cost the same at every team size we checked.

Team sizeAWS AmplifyGoogle App Engine
1 userFreeFree TierFreeStandard environment free quota
5 usersFreeFree TierFreeStandard environment free quota
10 usersFreeFree TierFreeStandard environment free quota
25 usersFreeFree TierFreeStandard environment free quota
50 usersFreeFree TierFreeStandard environment free quota

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Who AWS Amplify and Google App Engine suit

AudienceAWS AmplifyGoogle App Engine
Enterprise7/10Compliance programs including SOC, PCI, ISO and HIPAA, WAF integration and IAM controls suit organisations standardised on AWS.6/10It offers IAM and Identity-Aware Proxy, but reviewers raise concerns about lock-in and slow support.
Startups7/10No seat fees and a 12-month free tier help early teams, but reports of surprise charges call for watching billing closely.8/10The daily free F1 quota and scale-to-zero billing keep costs low for small apps, and reviewers call it a good fit for startups.
Developers8/10Built for front-end and full-stack developers, with a TypeScript backend, framework libraries and Git-based CI/CD, though it takes AWS knowledge.8/10Developers push code and Google handles scaling, patching, and load balancing.
SaaS Companies7/10Wildcard subdomains, Cognito auth and real-time AppSync data support multi-tenant SaaS apps on AWS.7/10Autoscaling, traffic splitting, and close links to Google Cloud data services support customer-facing SaaS backends.
Small Business4/10Setup and IAM complexity make it harder for non-technical small teams than simpler hosts.Not rated

Which One Should You Choose?

A
Why choose AWS Amplify

  • Higher Customization score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 8/10)

G
Why choose Google App Engine

  • Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 6/10)

Pros & Cons

A
AWS Amplify

Pros

  • No per-seat fees: team access is free and you pay only for builds, storage, transfer and SSR usage.
  • Gen 2 lets developers define Cognito auth, AppSync and DynamoDB data and Lambda functions in TypeScript, then extend them with any AWS resource through the CDK.
  • Git branches map to environments, pull requests can get preview deployments, and deployments are atomic.
  • AWS publishes a 99.95% monthly uptime SLA with tiered service credits.
  • Amplify is in scope for SOC, PCI, ISO, HIPAA, HITRUST and other AWS compliance programs, and integrates with AWS WAF.

Cons

  • Reviewers on G2 and Capterra say the learning curve is steep and debugging complex apps is hard.
  • Comparison articles say IAM setup and configuration are much heavier than on Vercel or Netlify.
  • Next.js support has documented gaps: no on-demand ISR, no Edge API routes, a 5.72 MB response size cap and a 220 MB build output limit for SSR apps.
  • Bills spread across many AWS services are hard to predict, and some users report unexpected charges from resources left running.
  • Some reviewers find Gen 2 restrictive when an app strays from its expected path, and the Gen 1 versus Gen 2 split confuses them.

G
Google App Engine

Pros

  • The standard environment scales to zero and includes 28 free F1 instance hours a day, so low-traffic apps can run very cheaply.
  • Built-in versioning and traffic splitting make canary releases, A/B tests, and rollbacks simple to run.
  • Reviewers value that there is no infrastructure to manage, since Google handles load balancing and security patches.
  • Native links to Cloud SQL, Firestore, Cloud Storage, and Pub/Sub.
  • The flexible environment runs any language in Docker containers and allows requests up to 60 minutes.

Cons

  • The standard sandbox does not allow WebSockets, background processes, or SSH.
  • The flexible environment cannot scale to zero and has no free tier.
  • Reviewers say pricing is hard to forecast and some were surprised by cost changes.
  • Code written for App Engine is hard to move to other clouds.
  • Some reviewers report slow support for critical issues, especially in some regions.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

AWS Amplify scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.2/10 against 7.1/10 for Google App Engine. The largest gap is in Customization: 7/10 for AWS Amplify and 5/10 for Google App Engine.

Both are free for 10 users.

Yes, both AWS Amplify and Google App Engine have a free plan.

Related Comparisons