atimeüs vs MOCO (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
atimeüs and MOCO both score 6.7/10 on our Finance Software criteria, and our pick is atimeüs. Its biggest advantage: higher Cost score (8/10 vs 6/10). For 10 users, atimeüs costs about €140/mo, against €150/mo for MOCO; neither atimeüs nor MOCO lists a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
atimeüs
6.7/10
atimeüs is a French cloud ERP for IT services firms (ESNs), consultancies and engineering firms. It covers timesheets, project profitability, staffing, invoicing and CRM.
MOCO
6.7/10
Swiss agency ERP that ties time tracking, project controlling, quotes, invoicing and incoming invoices together for agencies, consultancies and IT service firms.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 6.7/10 | 6.7/10 |
| Scalability | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Compliance | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Integration | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Support | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Cost | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Customization | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Ease of Use | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | €14/user/mo Offre unique | €15/user/mo Core |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | €140/mo Offre unique | €150/mo Core |
| Features | ||
| Budgeting and Forecasting | ||
| Invoicing | ||
| Tax Compliance | ||
| Accountant Access | Not listed | |
| Bank Reconciliation | Not listed | |
| Financial Reporting | Not listed | |
| General Ledger | Not listed | |
| Inventory Accounting | Not listed | |
atimeüs vs MOCO cost by team size
atimeüs costs less at every team size we checked.
| Team size | atimeüs | MOCO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | €14/moOffre unique | €15/moCore |
| 5 users | €70/moOffre unique | €75/moCore |
| 10 users | €140/moOffre unique | €150/moCore |
| 25 users | €350/moOffre unique | €375/moCore |
| 50 users | €700/moOffre unique | €750/moCore |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who atimeüs and MOCO suit
MOCO fits agencies better than atimeüs.
| Audience | atimeüs | MOCO |
|---|---|---|
| Agencies | 6/10The vendor site names web agencies as customers, but the feature set centres on ESN workflows. | 10/10It is built specifically as agency software, with time-to-invoice workflows. |
| Consultancies | 9/10The product is built for consulting firms, with project profitability, time tracking and staffing. | 9/10Billing from booked hours and profitability tracking suit consulting firms. |
| Small Business | 7/10The flat per-user price has no minimum seat count, which suits small service firms. | 7/10Core at 15 EUR per user suits small teams, but solo users find it expensive. |
| Engineering Firms | 7/10Engineering firms are named as a target segment on directory listings. | Not rated |
| Enterprise | Not rated | 3/10It is aimed at firms of up to about 150 employees. |
| Freelancers | Not rated | 4/10Reviewers say the price is high for one person, and there is no free plan. |
| IT Teams | 7/10It targets IT services companies (ESNs) that bill for consultant time. | Not rated |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose atimeüs
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: €140/mo vs €150/mo
- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Analytics score (7/10 vs 6/10)
Why choose MOCO
- Higher Security score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Compliance score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for agencies (10/10 vs 6/10)
Pros & Cons
atimeüs
Pros
- One flat price of 14 euros per active user per month, with every module included and no minimum seat count.
- Built for ESN billing models: fixed-price, time-and-materials, TMA and resale projects, with margin tracking.
- Connectors to French accounting and payroll tools (Pennylane, Sage, Cegid, Silae, PayFit), plus an open API and an MCP server.
- Reviewers praise responsive French support, and the vendor states an average response time of one hour.
- Reporting can be exported to Excel and Power BI for profitability analysis.
Cons
- Not a full accounting system: there is no general ledger, bank reconciliation or payroll, so a separate accounting tool is still needed.
- Narrowly focused on French service companies, and the interface and market are mainly French.
- Reviewers report that some modules, such as time entry, take time to learn and that some features are still incomplete.
- The mobile experience and advanced HR needs are reported as weak points.
- The vendor is very small, and independent review volume is limited.
MOCO
Pros
- Time tracking, project budgets and invoicing sit in one system, so billable hours flow straight to invoices.
- DATEV export is included even in the cheapest Core plan, which helps German tax-advisor handovers.
- OMR reviewers rate it 4.7 out of 5 from about 240 reviews, with high marks for usability and support.
- Data is hosted in Switzerland with EU options, and backups are encrypted.
- A 30-day trial needs no payment details and does not convert to a paid plan automatically.
Cons
- There is no general ledger: bookkeeping is limited to preparation for DATEV or an accountant.
- The CRM and leads features are basic, with no full sales pipeline.
- The mobile app mainly covers time tracking.
- Report customization is limited, and some reviewers want better bank reconciliation.
- There is no free plan, and Unlimited requires a high minimum number of users.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Both score 6.7/10 on our Finance Software criteria, and our pick is atimeüs. The largest gap is in Cost: 8/10 for atimeüs and 6/10 for MOCO.
Atimeüs costs less for 10 users: about €140/mo on its Offre unique plan, against about €150/mo on its Core plan for MOCO, billed monthly.
No, neither atimeüs nor MOCO lists a free plan.
MOCO is the better fit for agencies: we rate it 10/10 for them, against 6/10 for atimeüs.
