ArcGIS vs Asta Powerproject (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
ArcGIS is our pick, scoring 7.2/10 against 6.3/10 for Asta Powerproject on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Security score (7/10 vs 5/10). Only Asta Powerproject has a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
ArcGIS
7.2/10
Esri's GIS platform for mapping, spatial analysis and field data collection, used by utilities, governments and infrastructure owners to manage networks and assets.
Asta Powerproject
6.3/10
A Windows desktop planning tool from Eleco that construction planners use for critical path Gantt scheduling, resource and cost planning, and 4D BIM programmes.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.2/10 | 6.3/10 |
| Integration | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost | 3/10 | 4/10 |
| Analytics | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Free ProjectViewer |
| Features | ||
| Asset Registry | Not listed | |
| GIS and Mapping | Not listed | |
| Inspection Checklists | Not listed | |
| Offline Field App | Not listed | |
| Work Orders | Not listed | |
| More features | ||
| Scheduling | Not listed | |
| Spreadsheet interface | Not listed | |
| App integrations | Not listed | |
| Gantt charts | Not listed | |
| Timeline view | Not listed | |
| Task management | Not listed | |
| Dashboards | Not listed | |
| Reporting | Not listed | |
ArcGIS vs Asta Powerproject cost by team size
| Team size | ArcGIS | Asta Powerproject |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | FreeProjectViewer |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | FreeProjectViewer |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | FreeProjectViewer |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | FreeProjectViewer |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who ArcGIS and Asta Powerproject suit
| Audience | ArcGIS | Asta Powerproject |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | 8/10Large organizations can choose SaaS or self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise. | 7/10Concurrent licensing and Asta Enterprise support large contractors such as Willmott Dixon and Morgan Sindall. |
| Construction | Not rated | 10/10Built and marketed for construction programme planning, with 4D BIM and a site progress app. |
| Engineering Firms | Not rated | 8/10Critical path, resource and earned value tools suit engineering and infrastructure planners. |
| Field Teams | 8/10Field Maps supports offline task work, data capture and crew dispatch. | Not rated |
| Freelancers | Not rated | 3/10Per-seat cost and training needs make it a poor fit for occasional individual users. |
| Government | 9/10Government agencies are a core market for Field Maps and ArcGIS Online. | Not rated |
| Small Business | 4/10Reviewers say subscription and credit costs are hard to justify for small users. | Not rated |
| Utilities | 9/10Esri targets utilities with utility network tracing and field crew apps. | Not rated |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose ArcGIS
- Higher Security score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Analytics score (9/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose Asta Powerproject
- Has a free plan (ArcGIS does not)
- Higher Cost score (4/10 vs 3/10)
Pros & Cons
ArcGIS
Pros
- One platform covers desktop, cloud, self-hosted and mobile GIS, so office and field teams work from the same data.
- Field Maps works fully offline for maps, forms, tasks and utility network tracing.
- Integrates with Cityworks, Salesforce, Power Automate and offers APIs for custom systems.
- G2 reviewers praise how it handles layers and datasets and how easy cloud access makes remote work.
Cons
- No public pricing, and reviewers cite subscription and credit costs as the main complaint.
- Credits are consumed by premium services, which can limit heavy use.
- ArcGIS Online lacks some geoprocessing tools found in ArcGIS Pro and Desktop.
- Reviewers report a steep learning curve without training.
Asta Powerproject
Pros
- Critical path, float, multiple baseline and DCMA quality checks give planners depth close to Primavera P6.
- Imports and exports P6 XER and XML and Microsoft Project files, so contract-mandated formats can still be delivered.
- The BIM module links programmes to 3D models for 4D planning.
- The free ProjectViewer lets clients and subcontractors open plans without buying a seat.
- Concurrent licensing lowers the per-user cost for planning teams that share seats.
Cons
- Eleco publishes no prices. Third parties estimate about 1,300 to 1,700 USD per user per year, and reviewers call the pricing discouraging.
- The desktop app runs only on 64-bit Windows, and Mac users need the SaaS subscription.
- Reviewers report a steep learning curve, and Eleco sells multi-day training courses.
- Field progress updates need the separately licensed Siteprogress app, and shared resource pools need Asta Enterprise.
- Exporting to Microsoft Project can lose hammock tasks and custom calendars.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
ArcGIS scores higher on our Industrial & Infrastructure Software criteria: 7.2/10 against 6.3/10 for Asta Powerproject. The largest gap is in Analytics: 9/10 for ArcGIS and 7/10 for Asta Powerproject.
Asta Powerproject has a free plan; ArcGIS does not list one.
