b stack radar

Anyscale vs Baseten (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict

Baseten is our pick, scoring 6.8/10 against 6.3/10 for Anyscale on our AI Software criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Customization score (8/10 vs 7/10). Neither Anyscale nor Baseten lists a free plan.

Last updated: November 2026

Anyscale logo

Anyscale

6.3/10

Anyscale is a managed platform from the creators of Ray for running distributed AI data processing, training and inference on hosted or customer-owned cloud and Kubernetes compute.

Baseten logo

Baseten

6.8/10

Winner

Baseten is an AI inference platform that lets engineering teams serve, scale and train open-weight and custom models on managed multi-cloud GPUs, billed per minute.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
Anyscale logo
Anyscale
Baseten logo
Baseten
Scores
Overall Rating6.3/106.8/10
Integration7/106/10
Analytics7/107/10
Customization7/108/10
Ease of Use5/106/10
Support6/106/10
Cost4/105/10
Scalability9/109/10
Security8/109/10
Pricing
Free planNoNo
Cheapest paid planContact for pricingContact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricingContact for pricing
Features
API and CLI
Managed WordPressNot listed
Multiple Regions
Cloud Compute
Shared HostingNot listed
Managed DatabasesNot listed
Object StorageNot listed
Uptime SLANot listed
Serverless FunctionsNot listed

Who Anyscale and Baseten suit

Baseten fits saas companies and startups better than Anyscale.

AudienceAnyscaleBaseten
SaaS Companies6/10Useful for SaaS companies running batch inference or model serving at scale, though it does not host web front ends, databases or CI/CD.9/10Software companies such as Cursor, Notion and Lovable use it to serve AI features in their products.
Startups6/10The $100 starting credit and pay-as-you-go hosted option help AI startups, but reviewers say costs are hard to predict and the platform can be too much for simple workloads.8/10No contract and per-minute billing with scale to zero suit AI startups, though bills can rise fast with traffic.
Developers8/10Built for ML engineers and Python developers who write Ray code and want managed clusters, workspaces, a CLI and an SDK.9/10Built for ML and software engineers who package models with a CLI, config files and Python classes.
Enterprise8/10BYOC in the customer's own VPC, SSO/SAML/SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, and 24x7 enterprise support suit large AI teams.8/10Offers SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA BAAs, single-tenant and self-hosted deployments, BYOK encryption and negotiated SLAs.
Small Business2/10It is a specialist distributed AI compute platform and offers nothing for typical small business hosting needs.2/10Requires ML engineering skills and offers no no-code tools for non-technical teams.
HealthcareNot rated7/10Supports HIPAA with a BAA and zero retention for synchronous inference, and is used by clinical AI firms such as Abridge and OpenEvidence.

Which One Should You Choose?

Anyscale logo
Why choose Anyscale

  • Higher Integration score (7/10 vs 6/10)

Baseten logo
Why choose Baseten

  • Higher Customization score (8/10 vs 7/10)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for saas companies (9/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 6/10)

Pros & Cons

Anyscale logo
Anyscale

Pros

  • Built by the creators of Ray, so existing Ray code scales to large GPU clusters with few changes, a point G2 reviewers also make.
  • The BYOC option keeps data and compute inside the customer's own AWS, GCP or Kubernetes environment and can use existing GPU reservations.
  • Runs on several compute sources: AWS, GCP, Azure AKS, Nebius, CoreWeave and on-premises Kubernetes.
  • Holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, and offers SSO, SAML, SCIM and audit logs for multi-team governance.
  • Usage-based billing with no fixed monthly fee, plus $100 in starting credits for testing.

Cons

  • G2 reviewers report a steep learning curve for teams unfamiliar with Ray concepts.
  • Costs are hard to forecast, and Spheron estimates managed clusters cost roughly 1.5 to 2 times bare-metal GPU rates.
  • Rates for H100 and newer GPUs are not published and require contacting sales.
  • The hosted option has limited regions, business-hours support capped at 5 cases, and only temporary 90-day scratch storage.
  • It focuses on Ray workloads and does not cover web front ends, databases or CI/CD for full applications.

Baseten logo
Baseten

Pros

  • Broad compliance coverage: SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA with a BAA, GDPR and PCI DSS, plus BYOK encryption for model weights and payloads.
  • Flexible deployment: the same stack runs on Baseten's multi-cloud pool, on single-tenant clusters, or in a self-hosted data plane inside your own VPC.
  • Per-minute GPU billing and scale to zero (min replicas defaults to 0) mean idle dev deployments cost nothing.
  • Wide range of GPUs, from T4 at about $0.63 an hour to B200 at about $9.98 an hour, with failover across 20+ cloud providers.
  • Built-in logs, metrics and traces for every dedicated deployment, exportable to Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana and New Relic.

Cons

  • Covers inference, training and sandboxes only, so databases, object storage and general app hosting need another provider.
  • Dedicated replicas bill per minute while they run, including cold-start time and the default 15-minute scale-down delay, which can make bills hard to predict.
  • Built for ML engineers. Reviewers say non-technical teams will struggle, and performance tuning still needs ML expertise.
  • Very few independent reviews: G2 lists too few reviews to give buying insight.
  • SLAs, reserved capacity and volume discounts are only available through negotiated contracts with sales.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Baseten scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 6.8/10 against 6.3/10 for Anyscale. The largest gap is in Cost: 4/10 for Anyscale and 5/10 for Baseten.

No, neither Anyscale nor Baseten lists a free plan.

Baseten is the better fit for saas companies: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 6/10 for Anyscale.

Related Comparisons