Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Mattermost Comparison
Compare Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Mattermost features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
7.6/10
Amazon's public cloud platform, with over 200 pay-as-you-go services for compute, storage, databases, networking and AI, used by startups through large enterprises and governments.
Mattermost
6.7/10
Self-hostable, open-source team messaging and workflow platform with playbooks, kanban boards and AI agents, built for security-conscious and regulated organizations.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.6/10 | 6.7/10 |
| Integration | 10/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 8/10 | 3/10 |
| Customization | 10/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Scalability | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 10/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | $10/user/mo Professional |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free plan | Free Team Edition |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Multiple Regions | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| Team messaging | Not listed | |
| File sharing | Not listed | |
| Client collaboration | Not listed | |
| App integrations | Not listed | |
| Task lists | Not listed | |
| Workflow automation | Not listed | |
| Kanban boards | Not listed | |
| Collaboration tools | Not listed | |
Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Mattermost cost by team size
Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Mattermost cost the same at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Mattermost |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree plan | FreeTeam Edition |
| 5 users | FreeFree plan | FreeTeam Edition |
| 10 users | FreeFree plan | FreeTeam Edition |
| 25 users | FreeFree plan | FreeTeam Edition |
| 50 users | FreeFree plan | FreeTeam Edition |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Amazon Web Services (AWS)
- Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 3/10)
- Higher Integration score (10/10 vs 7/10)
- Better fit for startups (8/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose Mattermost
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Security score (10/10 vs 9/10)
Pros & Cons
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Pros
- The service catalogue is unusually broad, with over 200 services across 38 regions, so most infrastructure needs can be met on one platform.
- EC2 has a 99.99% region-level SLA with credits of up to 100%, and instances unavailable for more than six minutes in an hour are not billed for that hour.
- The free plan gives up to $200 in credits, and more than 30 always-free services let new teams experiment at low cost.
- Support scales from a $29 minimum up to dedicated Enterprise and Unified Operations tiers for mission-critical workloads.
- G2 rates it 4.4 across more than 17,000 reviews, and reviewers praise its scalability and global reach.
Cons
- Reviewers widely cite a steep learning curve across the console and services.
- Usage pricing is complex and can produce unexpected bills unless spend is monitored closely.
- Paid support is billed as a percentage of total AWS spend, so support costs rise with usage.
- A July 2025 billing console bug showed customers estimated charges in the billions, which hurt trust in its cost tooling.
Mattermost
Pros
- Can be fully self-hosted or air-gapped, which suits defense, government and regulated industries
- Enterprise tiers include strong compliance tooling: FIPS 140-3 builds, legal hold, compliance export and granular RBAC
- Playbooks give incident and DevOps teams repeatable checklists with automated triggers inside chat
- Built-in Jira, GitHub and GitLab integrations, plus an open API for custom bots
- Open-source core under MIT and AGPL licenses avoids full vendor lock-in
Cons
- The Boards kanban plugin is in maintenance mode and has been removed from the in-product marketplace
- Since v11 the free Entry plan shows only the last 10,000 messages and Team Edition is capped at 250 users, which drew community criticism
- The vendor publishes no prices, licenses are annual prepaid only, and every server needs its own license
- No Gantt charts, time tracking or project reporting, so it cannot replace a dedicated project management tool
- Self-hosting requires admin time and server upkeep
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon Web Services (AWS) scores higher on our AI Software criteria: 7.6/10 against 6.7/10 for Mattermost. The largest gap is in Analytics: 8/10 for Amazon Web Services (AWS) and 3/10 for Mattermost.
Both are free for 10 users.
Yes, both Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Mattermost have a free plan.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the better fit for startups: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 5/10 for Mattermost.
