Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is our pick, scoring 7.9/10 against 7.1/10 for Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Integration score (10/10 vs 8/10). For 10 users, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform are both free; both Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform have a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
7.9/10
Amazon's public cloud platform, with over 200 pay-as-you-go services for compute, storage, databases, networking and AI, used by startups through large enterprises and governments.
Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform
7.1/10
Open-core platform from Kubermatic that lets IT teams automate and centrally manage many Kubernetes clusters across public clouds, on-premises data centers, and edge sites.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.9/10 | 7.1/10 |
| Integration | 10/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 10/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Use | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Analytics | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free plan | Free Community Edition |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| Managed WordPress | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | Not listed | |
| Uptime SLA | Not listed | |
| VPS Hosting | Not listed | |
Amazon Web Services (AWS) vs Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform cost by team size
Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform cost the same at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree plan | FreeCommunity Edition |
| 5 users | FreeFree plan | FreeCommunity Edition |
| 10 users | FreeFree plan | FreeCommunity Edition |
| 25 users | FreeFree plan | FreeCommunity Edition |
| 50 users | FreeFree plan | FreeCommunity Edition |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform suit
Amazon Web Services (AWS) fits developers and small business better than Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform.
| Audience | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Developers | 9/10The full API, CLI and SDK tooling and the breadth of services suit engineers, though the learning curve is steep. | 6/10Developers can request clusters through the self-service portal, but someone still has to run the platform. |
| Small Business | 5/10It is affordable at low usage, but complex billing and setup can overwhelm non-technical small teams. | 3/10Running a multi-cluster management plane is too much overhead for a small business with only a few workloads. |
| Enterprise | 10/10Enterprise and Unified Operations support tiers and a broad compliance and service range are aimed at large organisations. | 9/10Kubermatic built it to automate thousands of clusters, and the Enterprise Edition targets organizations with more than 50 clusters. |
| Government | 8/10AWS runs dedicated GovCloud regions, which have their own support pricing. | Not rated |
| IT Teams | Not rated | 8/10Platform and IT operations teams get central lifecycle management, policy control and a self-service portal. |
| SaaS Companies | 9/10Multi-region infrastructure and managed services support running production SaaS workloads. | Not rated |
| Startups | 8/10The free plan credits and pay-as-you-go billing let startups begin cheaply and scale, which G2 reviewers note. | Not rated |
Which One Should You Choose?
Why choose Amazon Web Services (AWS)
- Higher Integration score (10/10 vs 8/10)
- Higher Customization score (10/10 vs 8/10)
- Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for small business (5/10 vs 3/10)
Why choose Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform
- Higher Cost score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (5/10 vs 4/10)
Pros & Cons
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Pros
- The service catalogue is unusually broad, with over 200 services across 38 regions, so most infrastructure needs can be met on one platform.
- EC2 has a 99.99% region-level SLA with credits of up to 100%, and instances unavailable for more than six minutes in an hour are not billed for that hour.
- The free plan gives up to $200 in credits, and more than 30 always-free services let new teams experiment at low cost.
- Support scales from a $29 minimum up to dedicated Enterprise and Unified Operations tiers for mission-critical workloads.
- G2 rates it 4.4 across more than 17,000 reviews, and reviewers praise its scalability and global reach.
Cons
- Reviewers widely cite a steep learning curve across the console and services.
- Usage pricing is complex and can produce unexpected bills unless spend is monitored closely.
- Paid support is billed as a percentage of total AWS spend, so support costs rise with usage.
- A July 2025 billing console bug showed customers estimated charges in the billions, which hurt trust in its cost tooling.
Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform
Pros
- The Community Edition is free and open source under Apache 2.0, so there is no lock-in to a proprietary control plane.
- It covers more than 20 public clouds plus vSphere, Nutanix, OpenStack, bare metal and edge from a single management plane.
- Kubermatic says one person can manage up to 20 times more clusters on a single management plane.
- It can import existing AKS, EKS and GKE clusters and enforce central OPA Gatekeeper policies on them.
- Kubermatic says it supports new upstream Kubernetes versions within four to six weeks of release.
Cons
- Enterprise Edition pricing is not published, so buyers have to contact sales.
- Customers must operate the platform themselves, because Kubermatic does not supply hosting or compute.
- Public user reviews are few, and many of them date from around 2021.
- The Enterprise features are aimed at large fleets, so small setups get limited value from the paid tier.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon Web Services (AWS) scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 7.1/10 for Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform. The largest gap is in Analytics: 8/10 for Amazon Web Services (AWS) and 6/10 for Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform.
Both are free for 10 users.
Yes, both Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform have a free plan.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the better fit for developers: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 6/10 for Kubermatic Kubernetes Platform.
