b stack radar

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict

Amazon S3 is our pick, scoring 7.8/10 against 7.6/10 for Google Cloud Storage on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Integration score (10/10 vs 9/10). Only Google Cloud Storage has a free plan.

Last updated: November 2026

A

Amazon S3

7.8/10

Winner

Amazon S3 is AWS's pay-as-you-go object storage service. Businesses use it to store files, backups, data lakes and static website assets at almost any scale.

G

Google Cloud Storage

7.6/10

Managed object storage from Google Cloud for unstructured data, offering several storage classes, multi-region replication and pay-per-use pricing for developers and enterprises.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
A
Amazon S3
G
Google Cloud Storage
Scores
Overall Rating7.8/107.6/10
Integration10/109/10
Support6/106/10
Cost5/105/10
Customization8/108/10
Security9/109/10
Reliability9/109/10
Ease of Use5/106/10
Analytics8/108/10
Scalability10/109/10
Pricing
Free planNoYes
Cheapest paid planContact for pricingContact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricingFree
Always Free
Features
API and CLI
Automatic Backups
Multiple Regions
Object Storage
Content Delivery NetworkNot listed
Dedicated ServersNot listed
Managed WordPress
Shared Hosting
Uptime SLANot listed

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage cost by team size

Team sizeAmazon S3Google Cloud Storage
1 userContact for pricingFreeAlways Free
5 usersContact for pricingFreeAlways Free
10 usersContact for pricingFreeAlways Free
25 usersContact for pricingFreeAlways Free
50 usersContact for pricingFreeAlways Free

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Who Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage suit

AudienceAmazon S3Google Cloud Storage
Developers9/10S3 is managed through a widely adopted API and SDKs, and that API has become the standard interface for object storage.9/10Developers can choose from the CLI, client libraries in eight languages, REST and gRPC APIs, Terraform and FUSE mounting.
Enterprise9/10It offers Object Lock, replication, audit logging and organisation-wide analytics through Storage Lens.9/10Customer-managed encryption keys, Bucket Lock retention and dual-region turbo replication meet enterprise compliance and resilience needs.
SaaS Companies8/10It scales without limit for application data, and transfers to other AWS services in the same Region are free.8/10Elastic pay-per-use storage with event notifications suits application backends, though egress costs need watching.
Small Business5/10The storage rates are cheap, but reviewers say the console and the pricing model are complex.5/10The service is capable but technical, and its metered pricing is harder to forecast than flat-rate storage.
Startups7/10There are no upfront costs, and new AWS accounts get Free Tier credits.7/10An always-free allowance and no minimum fee make it cheap to start, but pricing complexity can cause surprise bills.

Which One Should You Choose?

A
Why choose Amazon S3

  • Higher Integration score (10/10 vs 9/10)
  • Higher Scalability score (10/10 vs 9/10)

G
Why choose Google Cloud Storage

  • Has a free plan (Amazon S3 does not)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 5/10)

Pros & Cons

A
Amazon S3

Pros

  • Very high scale: about 500 trillion objects stored and around 200 million requests per second, according to Wikipedia.
  • The S3 API is the industry standard, so a wide range of tools and competing storage providers support it.
  • Strong data protection: versioning, MFA Delete, Object Lock in compliance mode, and cross-Region replication with a time-bound SLA.
  • Many storage classes, from Express One Zone to Glacier Deep Archive at about $0.001 per GB-month, let teams match cost to how often data is accessed.
  • Reviews are consistently positive: about 4.7 out of 5 from more than 1,100 Capterra reviews.

Cons

  • Internet egress costs about $0.09 per GB after the first free 100 GB a month, and competitors widely criticise these fees.
  • Request, retrieval and lifecycle-transition fees make monthly bills hard to predict.
  • Reviewers on Capterra and TrustRadius call the console navigation and user interface complex.
  • The SLA pays only service credits toward future bills, never refunds, and infrequent-access classes have a lower 99% uptime threshold.

G
Google Cloud Storage

Pros

  • Standard storage at about $0.020 per GB-month is slightly cheaper than S3 Standard at $0.023, and Archive costs about $0.0012 per GB-month.
  • Dual-region turbo replication aims to copy new objects within 15 minutes, which helps teams with strict recovery point objectives.
  • Data protection is broad: Bucket Lock, retention policies, versioning, and soft delete on by default with seven days of retention.
  • Developers get the CLI, client libraries in eight languages, REST and gRPC APIs, Terraform and FUSE mounting.
  • Native ties to BigQuery, Pub/Sub, Eventarc and Cloud CDN suit analytics and event-driven pipelines on Google Cloud.
  • Autoclass moves objects between classes without retrieval or early-deletion fees on those automatic moves.

Cons

  • Internet egress starts at about $0.12 per GB, which several comparisons rank among the highest of the major clouds.
  • Reviewers on G2, GetApp and Gartner say costs are hard to estimate, especially egress and retrieval.
  • Nearline, Coldline and Archive carry 30, 90 and 365-day minimum storage durations, plus retrieval fees.
  • Reviewers cite a learning curve and lock-in to Google Cloud.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Amazon S3 scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.8/10 against 7.6/10 for Google Cloud Storage. The largest gap is in Ease of Use: 5/10 for Amazon S3 and 6/10 for Google Cloud Storage.

Google Cloud Storage has a free plan; Amazon S3 does not list one.

Related Comparisons