b stack radar

Amazon S3 vs Cloud Run (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict

Amazon S3 is our pick, scoring 7.8/10 against 7.4/10 for Cloud Run on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Integration score (10/10 vs 8/10). Only Cloud Run has a free plan.

Last updated: November 2026

A

Amazon S3

7.8/10

Winner

Amazon S3 is AWS's pay-as-you-go object storage service. Businesses use it to store files, backups, data lakes and static website assets at almost any scale.

C

Cloud Run

7.4/10

Google Cloud's fully managed serverless platform for running containers, functions, batch jobs, and GPU workloads, scaling automatically and billed by usage.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
A
Amazon S3
C
Cloud Run
Scores
Overall Rating7.8/107.4/10
Integration10/108/10
Support6/106/10
Cost5/107/10
Customization8/107/10
Security9/108/10
Reliability9/108/10
Ease of Use5/107/10
Analytics8/106/10
Scalability10/109/10
Pricing
Free planNoYes
Cheapest paid planContact for pricingContact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersContact for pricingFree
Free tier
Features
Multiple Regions
Uptime SLA
API and CLINot listed
Automatic BackupsNot listed
Free SSL CertificatesNot listed
Git DeploymentsNot listed
Managed WordPressNot listed
Object StorageNot listed
Serverless FunctionsNot listed
Shared HostingNot listed

Amazon S3 vs Cloud Run cost by team size

Team sizeAmazon S3Cloud Run
1 userContact for pricingFreeFree tier
5 usersContact for pricingFreeFree tier
10 usersContact for pricingFreeFree tier
25 usersContact for pricingFreeFree tier
50 usersContact for pricingFreeFree tier

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Who Amazon S3 and Cloud Run suit

Amazon S3 fits enterprise better than Cloud Run.

AudienceAmazon S3Cloud Run
Enterprise9/10It offers Object Lock, replication, audit logging and organisation-wide analytics through Storage Lens.7/10It is backed by a 99.95% SLA in most regions and integrates with Google Cloud IAM and its services, though setup needs Google Cloud expertise.
Small Business5/10The storage rates are cheap, but reviewers say the console and the pricing model are complex.4/10Reviewers note that it requires a Google Cloud project, billing setup, and familiarity with IAM, which is too much for non-technical teams.
Startups7/10There are no upfront costs, and new AWS accounts get Free Tier credits.8/10Scale-to-zero and a monthly free tier keep costs low for workloads with little traffic.
Developers9/10S3 is managed through a widely adopted API and SDKs, and that API has become the standard interface for object storage.9/10Any container or language runs with no cluster management, and you can deploy from source or GitHub.
SaaS Companies8/10It scales without limit for application data, and transfers to other AWS services in the same Region are free.8/10Autoscaling HTTP services, jobs, and worker pools cover typical SaaS backend needs.

Which One Should You Choose?

A
Why choose Amazon S3

  • Higher Integration score (10/10 vs 8/10)
  • Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 6/10)
  • Better fit for enterprise (9/10 vs 7/10)

C
Why choose Cloud Run

  • Has a free plan (Amazon S3 does not)
  • Higher Cost score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 5/10)

Pros & Cons

A
Amazon S3

Pros

  • Very high scale: about 500 trillion objects stored and around 200 million requests per second, according to Wikipedia.
  • The S3 API is the industry standard, so a wide range of tools and competing storage providers support it.
  • Strong data protection: versioning, MFA Delete, Object Lock in compliance mode, and cross-Region replication with a time-bound SLA.
  • Many storage classes, from Express One Zone to Glacier Deep Archive at about $0.001 per GB-month, let teams match cost to how often data is accessed.
  • Reviews are consistently positive: about 4.7 out of 5 from more than 1,100 Capterra reviews.

Cons

  • Internet egress costs about $0.09 per GB after the first free 100 GB a month, and competitors widely criticise these fees.
  • Request, retrieval and lifecycle-transition fees make monthly bills hard to predict.
  • Reviewers on Capterra and TrustRadius call the console navigation and user interface complex.
  • The SLA pays only service credits toward future bills, never refunds, and infrequent-access classes have a lower 99% uptime threshold.

C
Cloud Run

Pros

  • Scale-to-zero with request-based billing means idle services cost nothing beyond any minimum instances you set.
  • It runs any container image, so there is no language or framework lock-in, and source deploys build images automatically.
  • Services, jobs, worker pools, and functions on one platform cover HTTP APIs, batch work, and queue consumers alike.
  • Every service gets managed HTTPS on run.app plus custom domains, with WebSockets, HTTP/2, and gRPC support.
  • On-demand NVIDIA L4 GPUs billed per second make it practical to serve AI inference without managing GPU VMs.
  • A 99.95% monthly uptime SLA applies for non-GPU services in most regions.

Cons

  • Cold starts when scaling from zero are the most common complaint, and keeping minimum instances warm adds ongoing cost.
  • Internet egress beyond 1 GiB, plus Cloud Build and Artifact Registry, are billed separately and can inflate bills.
  • Setup requires a Google Cloud project, a billing account, and familiarity with IAM.
  • GPU services must use instance-based billing, get no free tier, and are excluded from committed use discounts.
  • Usage-based billing can spike from traffic surges or runaway loops unless you set budgets and alerts.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Amazon S3 scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.8/10 against 7.4/10 for Cloud Run. The largest gap is in Analytics: 8/10 for Amazon S3 and 6/10 for Cloud Run.

Cloud Run has a free plan; Amazon S3 does not list one.

Amazon S3 is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for Cloud Run.

Related Comparisons