Amazon S3 vs Cloud Run (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Amazon S3 is our pick, scoring 7.8/10 against 7.4/10 for Cloud Run on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Integration score (10/10 vs 8/10). Only Cloud Run has a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
Amazon S3
7.8/10
Amazon S3 is AWS's pay-as-you-go object storage service. Businesses use it to store files, backups, data lakes and static website assets at almost any scale.
Cloud Run
7.4/10
Google Cloud's fully managed serverless platform for running containers, functions, batch jobs, and GPU workloads, scaling automatically and billed by usage.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | A Amazon S3 | C Cloud Run |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.8/10 | 7.4/10 |
| Integration | 10/10 | 8/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Analytics | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Scalability | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Cheapest paid plan | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Contact for pricing | Free Free tier |
| Features | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Uptime SLA | ||
| API and CLI | Not listed | |
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Free SSL Certificates | Not listed | |
| Git Deployments | Not listed | |
| Managed WordPress | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | Not listed | |
Amazon S3 vs Cloud Run cost by team size
| Team size | Amazon S3 | Cloud Run |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | Contact for pricing | FreeFree tier |
| 5 users | Contact for pricing | FreeFree tier |
| 10 users | Contact for pricing | FreeFree tier |
| 25 users | Contact for pricing | FreeFree tier |
| 50 users | Contact for pricing | FreeFree tier |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who Amazon S3 and Cloud Run suit
Amazon S3 fits enterprise better than Cloud Run.
| Audience | Amazon S3 | Cloud Run |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | 9/10It offers Object Lock, replication, audit logging and organisation-wide analytics through Storage Lens. | 7/10It is backed by a 99.95% SLA in most regions and integrates with Google Cloud IAM and its services, though setup needs Google Cloud expertise. |
| Small Business | 5/10The storage rates are cheap, but reviewers say the console and the pricing model are complex. | 4/10Reviewers note that it requires a Google Cloud project, billing setup, and familiarity with IAM, which is too much for non-technical teams. |
| Startups | 7/10There are no upfront costs, and new AWS accounts get Free Tier credits. | 8/10Scale-to-zero and a monthly free tier keep costs low for workloads with little traffic. |
| Developers | 9/10S3 is managed through a widely adopted API and SDKs, and that API has become the standard interface for object storage. | 9/10Any container or language runs with no cluster management, and you can deploy from source or GitHub. |
| SaaS Companies | 8/10It scales without limit for application data, and transfers to other AWS services in the same Region are free. | 8/10Autoscaling HTTP services, jobs, and worker pools cover typical SaaS backend needs. |
Which One Should You Choose?
AWhy choose Amazon S3
- Higher Integration score (10/10 vs 8/10)
- Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (9/10 vs 7/10)
CWhy choose Cloud Run
- Has a free plan (Amazon S3 does not)
- Higher Cost score (7/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
AAmazon S3
Pros
- Very high scale: about 500 trillion objects stored and around 200 million requests per second, according to Wikipedia.
- The S3 API is the industry standard, so a wide range of tools and competing storage providers support it.
- Strong data protection: versioning, MFA Delete, Object Lock in compliance mode, and cross-Region replication with a time-bound SLA.
- Many storage classes, from Express One Zone to Glacier Deep Archive at about $0.001 per GB-month, let teams match cost to how often data is accessed.
- Reviews are consistently positive: about 4.7 out of 5 from more than 1,100 Capterra reviews.
Cons
- Internet egress costs about $0.09 per GB after the first free 100 GB a month, and competitors widely criticise these fees.
- Request, retrieval and lifecycle-transition fees make monthly bills hard to predict.
- Reviewers on Capterra and TrustRadius call the console navigation and user interface complex.
- The SLA pays only service credits toward future bills, never refunds, and infrequent-access classes have a lower 99% uptime threshold.
CCloud Run
Pros
- Scale-to-zero with request-based billing means idle services cost nothing beyond any minimum instances you set.
- It runs any container image, so there is no language or framework lock-in, and source deploys build images automatically.
- Services, jobs, worker pools, and functions on one platform cover HTTP APIs, batch work, and queue consumers alike.
- Every service gets managed HTTPS on run.app plus custom domains, with WebSockets, HTTP/2, and gRPC support.
- On-demand NVIDIA L4 GPUs billed per second make it practical to serve AI inference without managing GPU VMs.
- A 99.95% monthly uptime SLA applies for non-GPU services in most regions.
Cons
- Cold starts when scaling from zero are the most common complaint, and keeping minimum instances warm adds ongoing cost.
- Internet egress beyond 1 GiB, plus Cloud Build and Artifact Registry, are billed separately and can inflate bills.
- Setup requires a Google Cloud project, a billing account, and familiarity with IAM.
- GPU services must use instance-based billing, get no free tier, and are excluded from committed use discounts.
- Usage-based billing can spike from traffic surges or runaway loops unless you set budgets and alerts.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon S3 scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.8/10 against 7.4/10 for Cloud Run. The largest gap is in Analytics: 8/10 for Amazon S3 and 6/10 for Cloud Run.
Cloud Run has a free plan; Amazon S3 does not list one.
Amazon S3 is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for Cloud Run.


