Amazon CloudFront vs MWS Cloud Comparison

A

Why choose Amazon CloudFront

• Has a free plan (MWS Cloud does not)
• Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 5/10)
• Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 5/10)
• Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 5/10)

Why choose MWS Cloud

Our data shows no clear advantage over Amazon CloudFront.

A

Amazon CloudFront

Pros

• The network is very large, with more than 750 PoPs plus over 1,140 PoPs embedded inside ISP networks.
• Data transfer from AWS origins such as S3 and EC2 to CloudFront costs nothing, which lowers costs for workloads hosted on AWS.
• Flat-rate plans start at $15 a month with no overage charges, which makes bills predictable.
• It has strong compliance coverage, including PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, SOC, ISO and FedRAMP Moderate.
• Two tiers of edge compute are available: CloudFront Functions at $0.10 per million invocations and Lambda@Edge for heavier code.

Cons

• G2 and Capterra reviewers report complex configuration and a steep learning curve for people new to AWS.
• Capterra-network reviewers rate customer support poorly, around 3.4 out of 5.
• Flat-rate plans lack some features, such as real-time logs, dedicated IP SSL and continuous deployment, and going over the allowance reduces performance.
• Dedicated IP SSL at $600 a month and Anycast Static IPs at $3,000 a month are expensive extras.
• Users on AWS re:Post and GitHub report cache invalidations that occasionally hang for hours or time out during deploys.

MWS Cloud

Pros

• It holds Russian compliance certifications, including 152-FZ at UZ-1, GOST R 57580, and PCI DSS 4.0.1.
• It runs on MTS's own data centers and network, with Tier III facilities and a stated 99.95% availability.
• The catalog is broad: managed PostgreSQL, MySQL, ClickHouse, Kafka, Valkey and Kubernetes, plus Object Storage and a CDN.
• Infrastructure can be automated through the API, CLI and Terraform as well as the web console.
• Security services include Anti-DDoS, WAF, KMS, Secret Manager and SOC.

Cons

• A 2025 Habr review found that most platform services were in preview, and Compute had no SLA.
• At review time, onboarding meant a form and a manual approval that could take up to 10 days, and the CDN was available only on request.
• The same review found no NAT gateway, only one storage class, and no automatic issuance of SSL certificates.
• Prices are not shown on the website, and one user comment called VM prices much higher than those of budget VPS hosts.
• Billing at review time had no budget alerts or forecasting.