Amazon CloudFront vs Fly.io Comparison
Compare Amazon CloudFront vs Fly.io features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Amazon CloudFront
7.9/10
Amazon CloudFront is the AWS content delivery network. It caches and serves websites, APIs and media from more than 750 edge locations, and includes DDoS protection, WAF and edge compute.

Fly.io
5.9/10
Fly.io is a developer cloud that runs containerized apps as fast-booting Machines in regions worldwide, billed by usage, with managed Postgres and object storage.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | A Amazon CloudFront | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.9/10 | 5.9/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Integration | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 | 4/10 |
| Scalability | 10/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $15/mo Pro (flat-rate) | $2/mo Pay-as-you-go (Machines) |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free (flat-rate) | $2/mo Pay-as-you-go (Machines) |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Uptime SLA | ||
| Automatic Backups | Not listed | |
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Free SSL Certificates | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed WordPress | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Serverless Functions | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | Not listed | |
Amazon CloudFront vs Fly.io cost by team size
Amazon CloudFront costs less at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Amazon CloudFront | Fly.io |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $2/moPay-as-you-go (Machines) |
| 5 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $2/moPay-as-you-go (Machines) |
| 10 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $2/moPay-as-you-go (Machines) |
| 25 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $2/moPay-as-you-go (Machines) |
| 50 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $2/moPay-as-you-go (Machines) |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
AWhy choose Amazon CloudFront
- Has a free plan (Fly.io does not)
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: Free vs $2/mo
- Higher Reliability score (9/10 vs 4/10)
- Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for enterprise (8/10 vs 5/10)
Why choose Fly.io

- Higher Cost score (7/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
AAmazon CloudFront
Pros
- The network is very large, with more than 750 PoPs plus over 1,140 PoPs embedded inside ISP networks.
- Data transfer from AWS origins such as S3 and EC2 to CloudFront costs nothing, which lowers costs for workloads hosted on AWS.
- Flat-rate plans start at $15 a month with no overage charges, which makes bills predictable.
- It has strong compliance coverage, including PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, SOC, ISO and FedRAMP Moderate.
- Two tiers of edge compute are available: CloudFront Functions at $0.10 per million invocations and Lambda@Edge for heavier code.
Cons
- G2 and Capterra reviewers report complex configuration and a steep learning curve for people new to AWS.
- Capterra-network reviewers rate customer support poorly, around 3.4 out of 5.
- Flat-rate plans lack some features, such as real-time logs, dedicated IP SSL and continuous deployment, and going over the allowance reduces performance.
- Dedicated IP SSL at $600 a month and Anycast Static IPs at $3,000 a month are expensive extras.
- Users on AWS re:Post and GitHub report cache invalidations that occasionally hang for hours or time out during deploys.
Fly.io

Pros
- Very low entry cost: a small shared Machine is about $2.19 a month, and invoices under $5 are waived.
- Apps can run in many regions with Anycast routing and global load balancing included at no extra cost.
- Per-hour billing and one-year reserved blocks that save 40 percent give flexible ways to manage cost.
- Managed Postgres plans include high availability, automated backups and connection pooling.
- A HIPAA package with a pre-signed BAA costs $99 a month on any paid plan.
Cons
- Status trackers show recurring network and API incidents through 2025 and 2026, and the CEO admitted reliability problems in 2023.
- The 99.9% uptime SLA is available only with Enterprise support, which starts at $2,500 a month.
- Bills spread across Machines, volumes, egress, IPs and support, which makes costs harder to predict.
- Apps need a Dockerfile and a fly.toml, which adds setup work compared with buildpack-style PaaS products.
- Compute costs more in some regions, up to 1.615 times in Sao Paulo.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon CloudFront scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 5.9/10 for Fly.io. The largest gap is in Reliability: 9/10 for Amazon CloudFront and 4/10 for Fly.io.
Amazon CloudFront costs less for 10 users: free on its Free (flat-rate) plan, against about $2/mo on its Pay-as-you-go (Machines) plan for Fly.io, billed monthly.
Amazon CloudFront has a free plan; Fly.io does not list one.
Amazon CloudFront is the better fit for enterprise: we rate it 8/10 for them, against 5/10 for Fly.io.





