Amazon CloudFront vs E2E Networks Comparison
Compare Amazon CloudFront vs E2E Networks features, pricing, and more.
Last updated: November 2026
Amazon CloudFront
7.9/10
Amazon CloudFront is the AWS content delivery network. It caches and serves websites, APIs and media from more than 750 edge locations, and includes DDoS protection, WAF and edge compute.

E2E Networks
6.1/10
Indian, NSE-listed cloud provider offering NVIDIA GPU cloud, CPU virtual machines, managed Kubernetes, databases, object storage and CDN for AI teams and developers.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | A Amazon CloudFront | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.9/10 | 6.1/10 |
| Integration | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 4/10 |
| Scalability | 10/10 | 7/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $15/mo Pro (flat-rate) | $10/mo Object Storage |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free (flat-rate) | $10/mo Object Storage |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Content Delivery Network | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Serverless Functions | ||
| Uptime SLA | ||
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Free SSL Certificates | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed Kubernetes | Not listed | |
| Managed WordPress | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | Not listed | |
Amazon CloudFront vs E2E Networks cost by team size
Amazon CloudFront costs less at every team size we checked.
| Team size | Amazon CloudFront | E2E Networks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $10/moObject Storage |
| 5 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $10/moObject Storage |
| 10 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $10/moObject Storage |
| 25 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $10/moObject Storage |
| 50 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | $10/moObject Storage |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Which One Should You Choose?
AWhy choose Amazon CloudFront
- Has a free plan (E2E Networks does not)
- Lower estimated cost for 10 users: Free vs $10/mo
- Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 5/10)
- Higher Security score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 7/10)
Why choose E2E Networks

- Higher Cost score (8/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
AAmazon CloudFront
Pros
- The network is very large, with more than 750 PoPs plus over 1,140 PoPs embedded inside ISP networks.
- Data transfer from AWS origins such as S3 and EC2 to CloudFront costs nothing, which lowers costs for workloads hosted on AWS.
- Flat-rate plans start at $15 a month with no overage charges, which makes bills predictable.
- It has strong compliance coverage, including PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, SOC, ISO and FedRAMP Moderate.
- Two tiers of edge compute are available: CloudFront Functions at $0.10 per million invocations and Lambda@Edge for heavier code.
Cons
- G2 and Capterra reviewers report complex configuration and a steep learning curve for people new to AWS.
- Capterra-network reviewers rate customer support poorly, around 3.4 out of 5.
- Flat-rate plans lack some features, such as real-time logs, dedicated IP SSL and continuous deployment, and going over the allowance reduces performance.
- Dedicated IP SSL at $600 a month and Anycast Static IPs at $3,000 a month are expensive extras.
- Users on AWS re:Post and GitHub report cache invalidations that occasionally hang for hours or time out during deploys.
E2E Networks

Pros
- GPU-hour rates such as $0.45 for a T4 and $3.99 for an H100 are low compared with the hyperscalers.
- Indian data centers suit buyers that need data to stay in India.
- Broad NVIDIA lineup, from T4 to B200, plus the TIR platform for training and inference.
- G2 reviewers praise the cost-effectiveness and how easy it is to get started.
Cons
- Instances are self-managed, so customers handle their own OS, backups and middleware.
- Few regions, all in India, and Mumbai has been discontinued for some services.
- According to a competitor's analysis, the SLA is 99.9 percent and disaster recovery is manual, active-passive failover.
- GPU, storage and CPU prices changed in mid-2026, according to a competitor's analysis.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon CloudFront scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 6.1/10 for E2E Networks. The largest gap is in Integration: 9/10 for Amazon CloudFront and 5/10 for E2E Networks.
Amazon CloudFront costs less for 10 users: free on its Free (flat-rate) plan, against about $10/mo on its Object Storage plan for E2E Networks, billed monthly.
Amazon CloudFront has a free plan; E2E Networks does not list one.
Amazon CloudFront is the better fit for developers: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for E2E Networks.





