Amazon CloudFront vs CoreWeave Comparison

A

Why choose Amazon CloudFront

• Has a free plan (CoreWeave does not)
• Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 6/10)
• Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 7/10)
• Better fit for small business (5/10 vs 2/10)
• Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 7/10)

Why choose CoreWeave

• Higher Support score (7/10 vs 6/10)
• Includes Dedicated Servers, which Amazon CloudFront lacks

A

Amazon CloudFront

Pros

• The network is very large, with more than 750 PoPs plus over 1,140 PoPs embedded inside ISP networks.
• Data transfer from AWS origins such as S3 and EC2 to CloudFront costs nothing, which lowers costs for workloads hosted on AWS.
• Flat-rate plans start at $15 a month with no overage charges, which makes bills predictable.
• It has strong compliance coverage, including PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, SOC, ISO and FedRAMP Moderate.
• Two tiers of edge compute are available: CloudFront Functions at $0.10 per million invocations and Lambda@Edge for heavier code.

Cons

• G2 and Capterra reviewers report complex configuration and a steep learning curve for people new to AWS.
• Capterra-network reviewers rate customer support poorly, around 3.4 out of 5.
• Flat-rate plans lack some features, such as real-time logs, dedicated IP SSL and continuous deployment, and going over the allowance reduces performance.
• Dedicated IP SSL at $600 a month and Anycast Static IPs at $3,000 a month are expensive extras.
• Users on AWS re:Post and GitHub report cache invalidations that occasionally hang for hours or time out during deploys.

CoreWeave

Pros

• Free internet egress and internal data transfer, which lowers the cost of moving large datasets and model checkpoints.
• Large inventory of current NVIDIA hardware, from L40S to GB200 NVL72, with InfiniBand for multi-node training.
• Spot rates are well below on-demand rates, for example $19.71 versus $49.24 per hour for an 8-GPU H100 node, and committed discounts reach up to 60%.
• The CKS control plane and SUNK Slurm scheduler are free, so you pay only for compute.
• A Terraform and OpenTofu provider manages clusters, VPCs, storage, and inference as code.

Cons

• No free tier or trial credits, and minimum spend is reported to be high even for light use.
• No managed databases, serverless functions, or CDN, so a second cloud is often needed.
• Regions are concentrated in North America and Europe, with limited Asia-Pacific coverage.
• The best pricing usually requires multi-year contracts and an enterprise sales process.
• Few public user reviews are available on G2 or Gartner to validate claims.