b stack radar

Amazon CloudFront vs Baseten (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict

Amazon CloudFront is our pick, scoring 7.9/10 against 7.2/10 for Baseten on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Integration score (9/10 vs 6/10). Only Amazon CloudFront has a free plan.

Last updated: November 2026

A

Amazon CloudFront

7.9/10

Winner

Amazon CloudFront is the AWS content delivery network. It caches and serves websites, APIs and media from more than 750 edge locations, and includes DDoS protection, WAF and edge compute.

Baseten logo

Baseten

7.2/10

Baseten is an AI inference platform that lets engineering teams serve, scale and train open-weight and custom models on managed multi-cloud GPUs, billed per minute.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
A
Amazon CloudFront
Baseten logo
Baseten
Scores
Overall Rating7.9/107.2/10
Integration9/106/10
Support6/106/10
Cost6/105/10
Customization9/108/10
Security9/109/10
Reliability9/108/10
Ease of Use5/106/10
Analytics7/107/10
Scalability10/109/10
Pricing
Free planYesNo
Cheapest paid plan$15/mo
Pro (flat-rate)
Contact for pricing
Estimated cost for 10 usersFree
Free (flat-rate)
Contact for pricing
Features
API and CLI
Multiple Regions
Serverless Functions
Uptime SLA
Cloud ComputeNot listed
Content Delivery NetworkNot listed
DDoS ProtectionNot listed
Dedicated ServersNot listed
Free SSL CertificatesNot listed
Managed DatabasesNot listed
Managed WordPressNot listed
Object StorageNot listed
Shared HostingNot listed

Amazon CloudFront vs Baseten cost by team size

Team sizeAmazon CloudFrontBaseten
1 userFreeFree (flat-rate)Contact for pricing
5 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)Contact for pricing
10 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)Contact for pricing
25 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)Contact for pricing
50 usersFreeFree (flat-rate)Contact for pricing

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Who Amazon CloudFront and Baseten suit

Amazon CloudFront fits small business better than Baseten.

AudienceAmazon CloudFrontBaseten
Small Business5/10Reviewers cite configuration complexity and costs as hurdles for smaller teams that are not technical.2/10Requires ML engineering skills and offers no no-code tools for non-technical teams.
SaaS Companies8/10It integrates natively with AWS origins and supports blue/green continuous deployment, a good fit for SaaS products hosted on AWS.9/10Software companies such as Cursor, Notion and Lovable use it to serve AI features in their products.
Startups7/10The always-free tier and the $15 Pro flat-rate plan keep early costs low.8/10No contract and per-minute billing with scale to zero suit AI startups, though bills can rise fast with traffic.
Developers9/10It offers a full API, works with CloudFormation and the SDKs, and runs code at the edge, which suits engineers who want deep control.9/10Built for ML and software engineers who package models with a CLI, config files and Python classes.
Enterprise8/10It holds PCI-DSS, HIPAA, SOC and FedRAMP Moderate compliance, offers custom pricing, and runs on a very large edge network.8/10Offers SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA BAAs, single-tenant and self-hosted deployments, BYOK encryption and negotiated SLAs.
HealthcareNot rated7/10Supports HIPAA with a BAA and zero retention for synchronous inference, and is used by clinical AI firms such as Abridge and OpenEvidence.

Which One Should You Choose?

A
Why choose Amazon CloudFront

  • Has a free plan (Baseten does not)
  • Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 5/10)
  • Better fit for small business (5/10 vs 2/10)

Baseten logo
Why choose Baseten

  • Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 5/10)

Pros & Cons

A
Amazon CloudFront

Pros

  • The network is very large, with more than 750 PoPs plus over 1,140 PoPs embedded inside ISP networks.
  • Data transfer from AWS origins such as S3 and EC2 to CloudFront costs nothing, which lowers costs for workloads hosted on AWS.
  • Flat-rate plans start at $15 a month with no overage charges, which makes bills predictable.
  • It has strong compliance coverage, including PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, SOC, ISO and FedRAMP Moderate.
  • Two tiers of edge compute are available: CloudFront Functions at $0.10 per million invocations and Lambda@Edge for heavier code.

Cons

  • G2 and Capterra reviewers report complex configuration and a steep learning curve for people new to AWS.
  • Capterra-network reviewers rate customer support poorly, around 3.4 out of 5.
  • Flat-rate plans lack some features, such as real-time logs, dedicated IP SSL and continuous deployment, and going over the allowance reduces performance.
  • Dedicated IP SSL at $600 a month and Anycast Static IPs at $3,000 a month are expensive extras.
  • Users on AWS re:Post and GitHub report cache invalidations that occasionally hang for hours or time out during deploys.

Baseten logo
Baseten

Pros

  • Broad compliance coverage: SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA with a BAA, GDPR and PCI DSS, plus BYOK encryption for model weights and payloads.
  • Flexible deployment: the same stack runs on Baseten's multi-cloud pool, on single-tenant clusters, or in a self-hosted data plane inside your own VPC.
  • Per-minute GPU billing and scale to zero (min replicas defaults to 0) mean idle dev deployments cost nothing.
  • Wide range of GPUs, from T4 at about $0.63 an hour to B200 at about $9.98 an hour, with failover across 20+ cloud providers.
  • Built-in logs, metrics and traces for every dedicated deployment, exportable to Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana and New Relic.

Cons

  • Covers inference, training and sandboxes only, so databases, object storage and general app hosting need another provider.
  • Dedicated replicas bill per minute while they run, including cold-start time and the default 15-minute scale-down delay, which can make bills hard to predict.
  • Built for ML engineers. Reviewers say non-technical teams will struggle, and performance tuning still needs ML expertise.
  • Very few independent reviews: G2 lists too few reviews to give buying insight.
  • SLAs, reserved capacity and volume discounts are only available through negotiated contracts with sales.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Amazon CloudFront scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 7.2/10 for Baseten. The largest gap is in Integration: 9/10 for Amazon CloudFront and 6/10 for Baseten.

Amazon CloudFront has a free plan; Baseten does not list one.

Amazon CloudFront is the better fit for small business: we rate it 5/10 for them, against 2/10 for Baseten.

Related Comparisons