Amazon CloudFront vs Baseten (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict
Amazon CloudFront is our pick, scoring 7.9/10 against 7.2/10 for Baseten on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Integration score (9/10 vs 6/10). Only Amazon CloudFront has a free plan.
Last updated: November 2026
Amazon CloudFront
7.9/10
Amazon CloudFront is the AWS content delivery network. It caches and serves websites, APIs and media from more than 750 edge locations, and includes DDoS protection, WAF and edge compute.

Baseten
7.2/10
Baseten is an AI inference platform that lets engineering teams serve, scale and train open-weight and custom models on managed multi-cloud GPUs, billed per minute.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | A Amazon CloudFront | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall Rating | 7.9/10 | 7.2/10 |
| Integration | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| Support | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Cost | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Customization | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Security | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Reliability | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Ease of Use | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Analytics | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Scalability | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Cheapest paid plan | $15/mo Pro (flat-rate) | Contact for pricing |
| Estimated cost for 10 users | Free Free (flat-rate) | Contact for pricing |
| Features | ||
| API and CLI | ||
| Multiple Regions | ||
| Serverless Functions | ||
| Uptime SLA | ||
| Cloud Compute | Not listed | |
| Content Delivery Network | Not listed | |
| DDoS Protection | Not listed | |
| Dedicated Servers | Not listed | |
| Free SSL Certificates | Not listed | |
| Managed Databases | Not listed | |
| Managed WordPress | Not listed | |
| Object Storage | Not listed | |
| Shared Hosting | Not listed | |
Amazon CloudFront vs Baseten cost by team size
| Team size | Amazon CloudFront | Baseten |
|---|---|---|
| 1 user | FreeFree (flat-rate) | Contact for pricing |
| 5 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | Contact for pricing |
| 10 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | Contact for pricing |
| 25 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | Contact for pricing |
| 50 users | FreeFree (flat-rate) | Contact for pricing |
The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.
Who Amazon CloudFront and Baseten suit
Amazon CloudFront fits small business better than Baseten.
| Audience | Amazon CloudFront | Baseten |
|---|---|---|
| Small Business | 5/10Reviewers cite configuration complexity and costs as hurdles for smaller teams that are not technical. | 2/10Requires ML engineering skills and offers no no-code tools for non-technical teams. |
| SaaS Companies | 8/10It integrates natively with AWS origins and supports blue/green continuous deployment, a good fit for SaaS products hosted on AWS. | 9/10Software companies such as Cursor, Notion and Lovable use it to serve AI features in their products. |
| Startups | 7/10The always-free tier and the $15 Pro flat-rate plan keep early costs low. | 8/10No contract and per-minute billing with scale to zero suit AI startups, though bills can rise fast with traffic. |
| Developers | 9/10It offers a full API, works with CloudFormation and the SDKs, and runs code at the edge, which suits engineers who want deep control. | 9/10Built for ML and software engineers who package models with a CLI, config files and Python classes. |
| Enterprise | 8/10It holds PCI-DSS, HIPAA, SOC and FedRAMP Moderate compliance, offers custom pricing, and runs on a very large edge network. | 8/10Offers SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA BAAs, single-tenant and self-hosted deployments, BYOK encryption and negotiated SLAs. |
| Healthcare | Not rated | 7/10Supports HIPAA with a BAA and zero retention for synchronous inference, and is used by clinical AI firms such as Abridge and OpenEvidence. |
Which One Should You Choose?
AWhy choose Amazon CloudFront
- Has a free plan (Baseten does not)
- Higher Integration score (9/10 vs 6/10)
- Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 5/10)
- Better fit for small business (5/10 vs 2/10)
Why choose Baseten

- Higher Ease of Use score (6/10 vs 5/10)
Pros & Cons
AAmazon CloudFront
Pros
- The network is very large, with more than 750 PoPs plus over 1,140 PoPs embedded inside ISP networks.
- Data transfer from AWS origins such as S3 and EC2 to CloudFront costs nothing, which lowers costs for workloads hosted on AWS.
- Flat-rate plans start at $15 a month with no overage charges, which makes bills predictable.
- It has strong compliance coverage, including PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, SOC, ISO and FedRAMP Moderate.
- Two tiers of edge compute are available: CloudFront Functions at $0.10 per million invocations and Lambda@Edge for heavier code.
Cons
- G2 and Capterra reviewers report complex configuration and a steep learning curve for people new to AWS.
- Capterra-network reviewers rate customer support poorly, around 3.4 out of 5.
- Flat-rate plans lack some features, such as real-time logs, dedicated IP SSL and continuous deployment, and going over the allowance reduces performance.
- Dedicated IP SSL at $600 a month and Anycast Static IPs at $3,000 a month are expensive extras.
- Users on AWS re:Post and GitHub report cache invalidations that occasionally hang for hours or time out during deploys.
Baseten

Pros
- Broad compliance coverage: SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA with a BAA, GDPR and PCI DSS, plus BYOK encryption for model weights and payloads.
- Flexible deployment: the same stack runs on Baseten's multi-cloud pool, on single-tenant clusters, or in a self-hosted data plane inside your own VPC.
- Per-minute GPU billing and scale to zero (min replicas defaults to 0) mean idle dev deployments cost nothing.
- Wide range of GPUs, from T4 at about $0.63 an hour to B200 at about $9.98 an hour, with failover across 20+ cloud providers.
- Built-in logs, metrics and traces for every dedicated deployment, exportable to Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana and New Relic.
Cons
- Covers inference, training and sandboxes only, so databases, object storage and general app hosting need another provider.
- Dedicated replicas bill per minute while they run, including cold-start time and the default 15-minute scale-down delay, which can make bills hard to predict.
- Built for ML engineers. Reviewers say non-technical teams will struggle, and performance tuning still needs ML expertise.
- Very few independent reviews: G2 lists too few reviews to give buying insight.
- SLAs, reserved capacity and volume discounts are only available through negotiated contracts with sales.
Not sold on either?
Frequently Asked Questions
Amazon CloudFront scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 7.2/10 for Baseten. The largest gap is in Integration: 9/10 for Amazon CloudFront and 6/10 for Baseten.
Amazon CloudFront has a free plan; Baseten does not list one.
Amazon CloudFront is the better fit for small business: we rate it 5/10 for them, against 2/10 for Baseten.


