b stack radar

AlloyDB for PostgreSQL vs Amazon CloudFront (2026): Pricing, Features & Verdict

Amazon CloudFront is our pick, scoring 7.9/10 against 7.2/10 for AlloyDB for PostgreSQL on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria. Its biggest advantage: higher Customization score (9/10 vs 6/10). For 10 users, AlloyDB for PostgreSQL and Amazon CloudFront are both free; both AlloyDB for PostgreSQL and Amazon CloudFront have a free plan.

Last updated: November 2026

A

AlloyDB for PostgreSQL

7.2/10

Fully managed, PostgreSQL-compatible database service on Google Cloud for demanding transactional, analytical and AI workloads, with a downloadable Omni edition.

A

Amazon CloudFront

7.9/10

Winner

Amazon CloudFront is the AWS content delivery network. It caches and serves websites, APIs and media from more than 750 edge locations, and includes DDoS protection, WAF and edge compute.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Feature
A
AlloyDB for PostgreSQL
A
Amazon CloudFront
Scores
Overall Rating7.2/107.9/10
Integration8/109/10
Support6/106/10
Cost4/106/10
Customization6/109/10
Security9/109/10
Reliability9/109/10
Ease of Use7/105/10
Analytics8/107/10
Scalability8/1010/10
Pricing
Free planYesYes
Cheapest paid planContact for pricing$15/mo
Pro (flat-rate)
Estimated cost for 10 usersFree
AlloyDB Omni Developer Edition
Free
Free (flat-rate)
Features
Multiple Regions
Uptime SLA
API and CLINot listed
Automatic BackupsNot listed
Content Delivery NetworkNot listed
DDoS ProtectionNot listed
Dedicated ServersNot listed
Free SSL CertificatesNot listed
Managed DatabasesNot listed
Managed WordPress
Serverless FunctionsNot listed
Shared Hosting

AlloyDB for PostgreSQL vs Amazon CloudFront cost by team size

AlloyDB for PostgreSQL and Amazon CloudFront cost the same at every team size we checked.

Team sizeAlloyDB for PostgreSQLAmazon CloudFront
1 userFreeAlloyDB Omni Developer EditionFreeFree (flat-rate)
5 usersFreeAlloyDB Omni Developer EditionFreeFree (flat-rate)
10 usersFreeAlloyDB Omni Developer EditionFreeFree (flat-rate)
25 usersFreeAlloyDB Omni Developer EditionFreeFree (flat-rate)
50 usersFreeAlloyDB Omni Developer EditionFreeFree (flat-rate)

The plan that fits each team size, billed monthly, before add-ons and usage charges. Each cost opens that tool's pricing calculator for the team size.

Who AlloyDB for PostgreSQL and Amazon CloudFront suit

Amazon CloudFront fits developers and small business better than AlloyDB for PostgreSQL.

AudienceAlloyDB for PostgreSQLAmazon CloudFront
Developers7/10Full Postgres compatibility, pgvector and AI integrations, plus the free Omni Developer Edition, appeal to developers building AI apps.9/10It offers a full API, works with CloudFormation and the SDKs, and runs code at the edge, which suits engineers who want deep control.
Small Business3/10Premium pricing compared with Cloud SQL makes it a poor fit for small, simple databases.5/10Reviewers cite configuration complexity and costs as hurdles for smaller teams that are not technical.
Enterprise9/10The 99.99% SLA, CMEK encryption, cross-region disaster recovery and scaling to 128 vCPUs are aimed at large production workloads.8/10It holds PCI-DSS, HIPAA, SOC and FedRAMP Moderate compliance, offers custom pricing, and runs on a very large edge network.
SaaS Companies8/10High-throughput Postgres compatibility and read pools suit growing SaaS backends on Google Cloud.8/10It integrates natively with AWS origins and supports blue/green continuous deployment, a good fit for SaaS products hosted on AWS.
StartupsNot rated7/10The always-free tier and the $15 Pro flat-rate plan keep early costs low.

Which One Should You Choose?

A
Why choose AlloyDB for PostgreSQL

  • Higher Ease of Use score (7/10 vs 5/10)
  • Higher Analytics score (8/10 vs 7/10)

A
Why choose Amazon CloudFront

  • Higher Customization score (9/10 vs 6/10)
  • Higher Cost score (6/10 vs 4/10)
  • Better fit for small business (5/10 vs 3/10)
  • Better fit for developers (9/10 vs 7/10)

Pros & Cons

A
AlloyDB for PostgreSQL

Pros

  • Primary instances are highly available by default, with a 99.99% SLA and failover in under 60 seconds.
  • The columnar engine lets teams run analytical queries on live transactional data without a separate warehouse.
  • AlloyDB AI provides vector search with ScaNN indexes, SQL calls to Vertex AI, OpenAI and Anthropic models, and natural-language-to-SQL.
  • Read pools of up to 20 nodes share storage, and storage scales automatically.
  • Omni runs the same engine outside Google Cloud, which reduces lock-in.

Cons

  • Independent analyses put it at roughly a 39% premium over Cloud SQL Enterprise.
  • It supports only PostgreSQL. There is no MySQL or SQL Server option.
  • Resizing an instance causes brief downtime, and you cannot freely choose Postgres versions.
  • Very few independent user reviews exist on G2 and PeerSpot.
  • Omni is self-managed, so you handle backups and high availability yourself.

A
Amazon CloudFront

Pros

  • The network is very large, with more than 750 PoPs plus over 1,140 PoPs embedded inside ISP networks.
  • Data transfer from AWS origins such as S3 and EC2 to CloudFront costs nothing, which lowers costs for workloads hosted on AWS.
  • Flat-rate plans start at $15 a month with no overage charges, which makes bills predictable.
  • It has strong compliance coverage, including PCI-DSS Level 1, HIPAA, SOC, ISO and FedRAMP Moderate.
  • Two tiers of edge compute are available: CloudFront Functions at $0.10 per million invocations and Lambda@Edge for heavier code.

Cons

  • G2 and Capterra reviewers report complex configuration and a steep learning curve for people new to AWS.
  • Capterra-network reviewers rate customer support poorly, around 3.4 out of 5.
  • Flat-rate plans lack some features, such as real-time logs, dedicated IP SSL and continuous deployment, and going over the allowance reduces performance.
  • Dedicated IP SSL at $600 a month and Anycast Static IPs at $3,000 a month are expensive extras.
  • Users on AWS re:Post and GitHub report cache invalidations that occasionally hang for hours or time out during deploys.

Not sold on either?

Frequently Asked Questions

Amazon CloudFront scores higher on our Hosting & Infrastructure criteria: 7.9/10 against 7.2/10 for AlloyDB for PostgreSQL. The largest gap is in Customization: 6/10 for AlloyDB for PostgreSQL and 9/10 for Amazon CloudFront.

Both are free for 10 users.

Yes, both AlloyDB for PostgreSQL and Amazon CloudFront have a free plan.

Amazon CloudFront is the better fit for developers: we rate it 9/10 for them, against 7/10 for AlloyDB for PostgreSQL.

Related Comparisons